The following appeared in an article in the Grandview Beacon. For many years the city of Grandview has provided annual funding for the Grandview Symphony. Last year, however, private contributions to the symphony increased by 200 percent and attendance at

Essay topics:

The following appeared in an article in the Grandview Beacon.
For many years the city of Grandview has provided annual funding for the Grandview Symphony. Last year, however, private contributions to the symphony increased by 200 percent and attendance at the symphony's concerts-in-the-park series doubled. The symphony has also announced an increase in ticket prices for next year. Given such developments, some city commissioners argue that the symphony can now be fully self-supporting, and they recommend that funding for the symphony be eliminated from next year's budget.

Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.

While it may seem plausible that monetary support to the symphony should be cut off next year due to increase of private contribution, attendance in symphony’s-concert-in-the-park-series along with anticipation of higher ticket prices next year, close scrutiny of his assertion reveals that the writer seems to have left off rather important considerations that should have been taken seriously. In order to make his recommendation more appealing to the readers, several questions ought to be answered.

The statistical value cited here as evidence shows a 200% increase in private contributions...

*** The full content of this essay is available to VIP readers

Subscribe as testbig VIP readers and get unlimited access to essays on the top list.

Votes
Average: 9 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.0 out of 6
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 429 350
No. of Characters: 2256 1500
No. of Different Words: 236 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.551 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.259 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.925 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 164 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 128 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 94 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 59 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 28.6 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 15.827 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.533 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.343 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.591 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.093 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5