All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with these statements and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statements might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Many times, different companies hire outside consultants to plan strategies leading to more efficient operations. However, the author objects this idea by saying that these consultants are unnecessary if the company listened to their own employees. In my opinion, this objections has few invalid assumptions and reasons.
First of all, a company comprises of a large group of people. All of them may not have same views about how company should operate efficiently. If the managing board asks for views from employees, there is a fair chance that it will result in a myriad of ideas which would all be different and may lead to conflicts and chaos. Company cannot accept each and every opinion and even if they try to consider some of the ideas, it would be difficult.
Secondly, professional consultants are trained to identify the ways to improve operations of their clients. They examine every aspect of operations taking place in the company and provide their insights to modify those operations to gain efficiency while also looking at the impacts these modifications will have on each department or section of the company. They would try to maximize efficiency of the company as a whole unit. On the other hand, employees from various departments have insights about their deparment only and may not be able to identify the consequenses of their ideas on the company as a whole.
Thirdly, hiring these consultants saves a lot of time of managerial board and the employees as they do not have to put in extra efforts to identify ways to improve efficiency of their company. The company can focus on their work while consultants would take care of planning strategies.
However, it would not make sense to completely ignore the views presented by employees and just accept whatever the consultants suggest as sometimes the consultants might have missed out on some important aspects which a regular employee would have easily pointed out. A company should ask their employees to present their views and try to amalgamate those with strategies planned by outside consultants wherever they are compatible to operate more efficiently.
Thus, for a company to operate more efficiently it would make sense to reconcile strategies planned by outside consultants with views presented by majority of employees as it would save a lot of time and energy, would have a mixture of an outsider's as well as an insider's ideas and would serve company as a whole more efficiently.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 265, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... to their own employees. In my opinion, this objections has few invalid assumptions ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 25, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
...and reasons. First of all, a company comprises of a large group of people. All of them ma...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 406, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...pinion and even if they try to consider some of the ideas, it would be difficult. Second...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 237, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an outsider' or simply 'outsiders'?
Suggestion: an outsider; outsiders
...ime and energy, would have a mixture of an outsiders as well as an insiders ideas and would ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'third', 'thirdly', 'thus', 'well', 'while', 'as well as', 'first of all', 'in my opinion', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.233409610984 0.240241500013 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.162471395881 0.157235817809 103% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0572082379863 0.0880659088768 65% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0663615560641 0.0497285424764 133% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0480549199085 0.0444667217837 108% => OK
Prepositions: 0.128146453089 0.12292977631 104% => OK
Participles: 0.0320366132723 0.0406280797675 79% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.79462392214 2.79330140395 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.045766590389 0.030933414821 148% => OK
Particles: 0.0045766590389 0.0016655270985 275% => OK
Determiners: 0.105263157895 0.0997080785238 106% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.045766590389 0.0249443105267 183% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.00686498855835 0.0148568991511 46% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2480.0 2732.02544248 91% => OK
No of words: 408.0 452.878318584 90% => OK
Chars per words: 6.07843137255 6.0361032391 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.58838876751 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.350490196078 0.366273622748 96% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.299019607843 0.280924506359 106% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.198529411765 0.200843997647 99% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.142156862745 0.132149295362 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79462392214 2.79330140395 100% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 219.290929204 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473039215686 0.48968727796 97% => OK
Word variations: 51.2188878769 55.4138127331 92% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6194690265 78% => OK
Sentence length: 25.5 23.380412469 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.3962763558 59.4972553346 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.0 141.124799967 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 23.380412469 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.125 0.674092028746 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 55.4019607843 51.4728631049 108% => OK
Elegance: 1.42148760331 1.64882698954 86% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.436930340294 0.391690518653 112% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.14916307694 0.123202303941 121% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0835302799423 0.077325440228 108% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.627322472676 0.547984918172 114% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.159746399795 0.149214159877 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.191105266332 0.161403998019 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104232424732 0.0892212321368 117% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.357774031602 0.385218514788 93% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.130998601894 0.0692045440612 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.28713857272 0.275328986314 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.066389533942 0.0653680567796 102% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.30420353982 38% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 11.0 7.22455752212 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.5995575221 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.