All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with these statements and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statements might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
On first glance, the given issue issue might make one disagree with it, and make one suggest that paid help, in the form of these consultants, is the most efficient way to overcome problems, and to follow an effective path. But, on the contrary, these consultants are both expensive, and follow a strictly regimented procedure, with little room for adaptation.Companies, especially start-ups, should promote the practice, where the employees themselves bring up problems being faced, and take into consideration their opinions on a possible solution.
Firstly, with the given rising consultation charges, burdening the companies with added expenditures, it makes no sense in wasting much of the income on such services. Especially in the start-up culture, which is abounding in India, where many of them are barely able to break-even! More often than not, a major chunk of their income goes into consultation fees and what not. Hence, the least we could do for the sake of being cost effective, is to spend time absorbing the grievances and possible solutions which can be provided to us for no charge from our own employees!
Secondly, the employees of the company are the major backbone upon which several startups are reliant upon. They can truly provide us with the actual problems which are faced on-line and off-line. They can provide feedback, along with the possible fixes required to create a more effective business. The fact that they are the ones, working assiduously in the company, and know exactly what needs to be done, hence we can be sure they will give us the most ingenuous answers.
Finally, we can all agree that most employees strive towards rising in their ranks. Hence by providing sufficient incentives, we can be sure that most of them will give us their best efforts and come up with effective solutions, providing us with the best results.
A good analogy to remember would be that, just as an individual looks for ways to improve, he is likely to contemplate and look within himself, similarly, a company in the same predicament, must look within. For within its organization, are several talented employees, who are able to provide cost-effective and honest solutions. Trust them!
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: ON_FIRST_GLANCE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'at'?
Suggestion: At
On first glance, the given issue issue mig...
^^
Line 1, column 28, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: issue
On first glance, the given issue issue might make one disagree with it, and ma...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 361, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Companies
...cedure, with little room for adaptation.Companies, especially start-ups, should promote t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 85, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...s strive towards rising in their ranks. Hence by providing sufficient incentives, we ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, hence, look, second, secondly, similarly, so, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1860.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 364.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10989010989 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84605838017 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574175824176 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Interrogative: 3.0 0.740449438202 405% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.7765088323 60.3974514979 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.0 118.986275619 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3333333333 23.4991977007 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58333333333 5.21951772744 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195814501099 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612384195902 0.0831039109588 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448395771364 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102981438597 0.150359130593 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607129984067 0.0667264976115 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 14.1392134831 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 48.8420337079 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.