Analysis of Issue:
Formal educational credits should be the most important factor in hiring employees.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the above opinion. Support your opinion with reasons and examples
The question whether formal educational credentials should be the most important factor in hiring employees has been ongoing for some time. While education credentials deserve recognition for acquiring them, experience should the important driving factor in the hiring of employees. With experience come a range of benefits such as relevant position experience and knowledge in accurately performing the position's requirements. Furthermore, any employee with experience usually also has the benefits of transferable skills even if they did not perform the exact same positions' functions. The final reasons and perhaps the biggest is that an experienced employee has an increased understanding of the currently business industry and has both acquired resources and a network of people to help them better fulfil the positions needs. We will examine each reason in further detail.
An experienced employee with relevant experience requires less training to better perform the tasks at hand. They are also less prone in making mistakes due to their experience having made them previously. The ability to immediately fit into the positions also means that the degree to which business operations slowdown due to the learning curve a person with only formal educational credits has presents, is lessened significantly. These reason translate to lower costs and increased revenue potential for the hiring company.
Additionally, an employee with similar experiences from another industry has acquired many existing skills that would be considered transferable. While that employee may not have performed the exact same functions that the position requires, many of their skills they developed and honed in the previous position still apply to the new position and are considered transferable.
In the final reason, an employee that has had prior experience in the same or similar industry understand the functionality of the business and its operations. While formal education credits usually cover an industry, it is more likely broad in scope and covers many different variables within that existing industry. An employee with experience has the exact needed knowledge for that exact industry. Additional benefits that experienced employees offer are an established network of resources. These resources can come in the form of significant information and people.
In the end, it can be seen that while formal educational credits are nice perks to have, experience offer a stronger ranges of benefits which can immediately apply to the position in question. Through the use of relevant prior experience, transferable skills or current industry knowledge and resources the position is best filled with an employee who has experience.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[5]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "The question"?
Suggestion: Whether
The question whether formal educational credentials should b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 460, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'usually' is usually put before the verb 'experience'.
Suggestion: usually experience
...rements. Furthermore, any employee with experience usually also has the benefits of transferable s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 302, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'operations'' or 'operation's'?
Suggestion: operations'; operation's
...means that the degree to which business operations slowdown due to the learning curve a pe...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 342, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to curve'
Suggestion: to curve
...operations slowdown due to the learning curve a person with only formal educational c...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 263, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...s more likely broad in scope and covers many different variables within that existing industry...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'furthermore', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'still', 'while', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.264108352144 0.240241500013 110% => OK
Verbs: 0.153498871332 0.157235817809 98% => OK
Adjectives: 0.119638826185 0.0880659088768 136% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0519187358916 0.0497285424764 104% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0270880361174 0.0444667217837 61% => OK
Prepositions: 0.112866817156 0.12292977631 92% => OK
Participles: 0.0496613995485 0.0406280797675 122% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.95403912849 2.79330140395 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0225733634312 0.030933414821 73% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.121896162528 0.0997080785238 122% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0180586907449 0.0249443105267 72% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0135440180587 0.0148568991511 91% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2738.0 2732.02544248 100% => OK
No of words: 414.0 452.878318584 91% => OK
Chars per words: 6.61352657005 6.0361032391 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.58838876751 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.442028985507 0.366273622748 121% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.364734299517 0.280924506359 130% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.297101449275 0.200843997647 148% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.195652173913 0.132149295362 148% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95403912849 2.79330140395 106% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 219.290929204 90% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478260869565 0.48968727796 98% => OK
Word variations: 52.1836919584 55.4138127331 94% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6194690265 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.7894736842 23.380412469 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8432113896 59.4972553346 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.105263158 141.124799967 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7894736842 23.380412469 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.421052631579 0.674092028746 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.21349557522 96% => OK
Readability: 58.2629036359 51.4728631049 113% => OK
Elegance: 1.83495145631 1.64882698954 111% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393909846288 0.391690518653 101% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.133310796879 0.123202303941 108% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0973774773648 0.077325440228 126% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.536237833195 0.547984918172 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.154284803303 0.149214159877 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16202757091 0.161403998019 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899867417035 0.0892212321368 101% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.396919104259 0.385218514788 103% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0813815545559 0.0692045440612 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277497124924 0.275328986314 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0661261471023 0.0653680567796 101% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.4325221239 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.30420353982 38% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 11.0 7.22455752212 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.66592920354 27% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.70907079646 148% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.