In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position
It is an inherently viable move that we all, as individual make, asking the (new comer) to call his superior when we are unsatisfied with what we get as response to the query we put up in the first place. For instance, we demand for the presence of a senior manager, when supposedly the description about the services in a hotel are inarticulately explained by staff. The customer longs to meet the manager of the bank in case the clerk is unable to clarify on the grounds on which bank deducts yearly credit card service amount. Inquiring about the football clubs, an individual following the sport since long is for sure going to ace the quiz or tell the name a football team to which a player belongs, compared to a naïve follower. Be it any profession, sport, politics or for that matter business, a beginner is likely to run over by the glut of questions where in all reversal, an expert in the field is likely to tackle them.
It is true that the beginner has an inundate enthusiasm to carry out the task. First day imbibes height levels of epinephrine in blood and it is portrayed by the actions. However, chances of being able to answer queries or answering them without help is challenging and virtually impossible. On the other side of the palm, it’s a cake walk for an expert already engaged in the field.
One tends to demand for a senior official in police force when it comes to addressing the media persons, rather than a constable, such that the questions don’t stumble the image of the police. The apex court appoints the experienced and much knowledgeable judges who could cogently sieve the right and wrong and deliver judgment without any err. The head chef has to taste the cuisines in an elite restaurant as in case of complaints for food, situation could be gripped. Well, the exemplifications converge to the fact that the expert in a field have much more experience and the ability to handle the situations and answer to the justifiable queries put forward.
Although the beginners are full of ideas and focus more on learning, they lack the prescience vision to handle an amok situation. The ability to tackle the questionnaires and put forward the solutions can come with experience in the field and for the time in a particular field should be handled by the expert.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 77, Rule ID: NEW_COMER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'newcomer'?
Suggestion: newcomer
... we all, as individual make, asking the new comer to call his superior when we are unsati...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 34, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...them. It is true that the beginner has an inundate enthusiasm to carry out the task. First...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'thus', 'well', 'as to', 'for instance', 'it is true', 'in the first place']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.251685393258 0.240241500013 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.14606741573 0.157235817809 93% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0741573033708 0.0880659088768 84% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0269662921348 0.0497285424764 54% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0337078651685 0.0444667217837 76% => OK
Prepositions: 0.121348314607 0.12292977631 99% => OK
Participles: 0.0314606741573 0.0406280797675 77% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.69792380673 2.79330140395 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0426966292135 0.030933414821 138% => OK
Particles: 0.00674157303371 0.0016655270985 405% => OK
Determiners: 0.155056179775 0.0997080785238 156% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00898876404494 0.0249443105267 36% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0179775280899 0.0148568991511 121% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2306.0 2732.02544248 84% => OK
No of words: 405.0 452.878318584 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69382716049 6.0361032391 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.58838876751 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.316049382716 0.366273622748 86% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.22962962963 0.280924506359 82% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.175308641975 0.200843997647 87% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.111111111111 0.132149295362 84% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69792380673 2.79330140395 97% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 219.290929204 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550617283951 0.48968727796 112% => OK
Word variations: 63.363016178 55.4138127331 114% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6194690265 73% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.380412469 115% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1280587416 59.4972553346 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.733333333 141.124799967 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 23.380412469 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.674092028746 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 49.962962963 51.4728631049 97% => OK
Elegance: 1.95652173913 1.64882698954 119% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.575455918882 0.391690518653 147% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.132666406773 0.123202303941 108% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0602347202049 0.077325440228 78% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.631465350324 0.547984918172 115% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.104088240243 0.149214159877 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.288195546789 0.161403998019 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0930598586693 0.0892212321368 104% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.561580889323 0.385218514788 146% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0685569617839 0.0692045440612 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.450603384179 0.275328986314 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495855843111 0.0653680567796 76% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.4325221239 77% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.30420353982 113% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 4.0 7.22455752212 55% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.70907079646 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 7.0 13.5995575221 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.