In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The statement comparing an apprentice's acumen in any field of inquiry with an expert's acumen and asserting that the beginner is usually more likely to make important contributions, is a little overstated. By the definition of a beginner, one is said to be a beginner because they are learning and experiencing new areas of a study or a field for the first time. Moreover, the word expert can be credited with many synonyms such as erudite, learned, scholarly, etc.; one can easily extrapolate from these two definitions that an apprentice in any give field of inquiry learns new things whereas an expert practices the things that he/she has already learned and explores new corners of the field.
A beginner in a field of study or inquiry comes across a lot of other things that are not just mentioned in the written textual theory but are experiences that are discovered along the path of learning. An expert who has been through this stage has a gradually better awareness about procedures and various other things than a beginner does. For instance, any research in the field of science or engineering or economics requires various scholarly minds that have graduated at many levels in their respective fields in order to carry out the specific research program. A beginner, however, cannot match the expert's level of knowledge in order to carry out researches that might require some knowledge that the beginner has not even come across yet.
Another scenario which exemplifies against the message that the statement is trying to evince is in the field of law. Many individuals take up law as their field of interest and contribute to the global habitat of disagreements and establishment of dogmas through their skills. But in order to become a great lawyer, people practice law for years and then finally consider themselves worthy enough to make imminent contributions to the society through their power of expression. As the old wise saying goes: practice makes a man perfect. No lawyer in his yester years, considers himself in any position to make any new and reverent contribution to his field, and even if one does plan on doing so, their path is too long and probably until they can be called as "experts" (lawyers).
Although, in some cases, a beginner's perspective is considered to have better implications. For example, in the field of politics,in a democratic government, sometimes the youth's voice is much wiser and utalitarian than the old politician's- who are highly venal and susceptible to the ways of the old customs. However, this is the reason the civil services comission young citizens in order to balance the pros and cons of the young minds and the old ones. Remarkable contributions can be made to the society if both, the beginner and the expert work together in order to achieve a common and meaningful goal.
In the end, a society constitutes both the beginners and the experts where the beginners eventually become experts and then novice apprentices join and the cycle goes on. The beneficial contributions to the society or any particular field of study is however, in most cases, made by the experts and sometimes the beginners.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 28, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'apprentices'' or 'apprentice's'?
Suggestion: apprentices'; apprentice's
The statement comparing an apprentices acumen in any field of inquiry with an ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'experts'' or 'expert's'?
Suggestion: experts'; expert's
... acumen in any field of inquiry with an experts acumen and asserting that the beginner ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 28, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beginners'' or 'beginner's'?
Suggestion: beginners'; beginner's
...lawyers. Although, in some cases, a beginners perspective is considered to have bette...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 130, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...s. For example, in the field of politics,in a democratic government, sometimes the ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, so, then, whereas, for example, for instance, such as, in most cases, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 14.8657303371 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2655.0 2235.4752809 119% => OK
No of words: 531.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80035803286 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86333990738 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 215.323595506 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495291902072 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 842.4 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.3175751879 60.3974514979 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.5 118.986275619 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 23.4991977007 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05555555556 5.21951772744 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203379708212 0.243740707755 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633787240009 0.0831039109588 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431078342134 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107317283844 0.150359130593 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302467673619 0.0667264976115 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 48.8420337079 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 100.480337079 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.7820224719 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.