The best way for a society to prepare its young people for
leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by
instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
A person is said to possess leadership skills if the chief qualities exhibited by the person are – An aim for the future, a meticulous plan to achieve specific goals, a charisma to attract the hoi-polloi, and a confident and steadfast attitude towards any issue. If we look at all these traits, a common strain that emerges is the cooperative attitude of a leader. Making plans regarding future goals, making people understand the efforts required to accomplish a goal, all of this requires a leader to cooperate with people so as to produce maximum throughput. But, can cooperation alone bring the best out of a person? No, it can’t, but, a sense of competition he can help to unleash the potential of a person, because, competition allows you to juxtapose your performance against someone else, enabling you to assess your own flaws, and correct them effectively.
The leaders of various Smartphone manufacturing industries, such as Samsung, Motorola, Apple etc., are highly cooperative in nature. It is not easy to establish a company in several parts of the world, because every country has its own rules and regulations to which all companies have to strictly adhere to. But, from the tremendous growth (sales) of Samsung, and Apple in various countries, it is evident that their leaders have been cooperative with the respective governments of the countries, and have successfully negotiated terms under which they can operate in these countries.
But, these companies have also faced strong competition from all their competitors in the Smartphone market. Every company tried to outwit the other by releasing products that are highly innovative and customer-friendly. All companies keep tabs on their competitors to ascertain their next big move. This fierce competition has made the leaders of such companies to push their existing limits, and aim for higher levels of creativity, innovation and productivity. A competitive environment also ensures that only the best can survive in the market. Nokia serves as an example of a company which was once at the forefront of the Mobile phone industry, but now has crashed out of the market because it failed to improvise on its products, thus relinquishing the market to other tech giants such as Apple and Samsung.
Thus, instilling a sense of cooperation alone cannot prepare today’s youth for leadership, but combining it with a competitive attitude will definitely make the youth to effectively connect and negotiate with people, and also to bring out the exceptional capabilities that they possess.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 526, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...uires a leader to cooperate with people so as to produce maximum throughput. But, can c...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h they can operate in these countries. But, these companies have also faced str...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tech giants such as Apple and Samsung. Thus, instilling a sense of cooperation ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, regarding, so, still, thus, as to, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2165.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 413.0 442.535393258 93% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24213075061 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00849966617 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544794188862 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 683.1 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.4189319545 60.3974514979 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.333333333 118.986275619 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5333333333 23.4991977007 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0864752330361 0.243740707755 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0277855307325 0.0831039109588 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0226930087726 0.0758088955206 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.05068584189 0.150359130593 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218435862133 0.0667264976115 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 48.8420337079 73% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 100.480337079 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.