The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry or other fields, is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
Nowadays people are more concentrated on competition rather than cooperation. In order to build up young people with a leadership quality for the society, we should focus more on cooperation.
People who only has competitive quality won't understand how to cooperate with real world. We have to prepare our future generation with more quality of cooperation, as it is need in different field of career not only for bringing up leaders in the government.
To substantiate this view, I would like to cite an example. Considering two students, one is having only competitive nature and other is having cooperation more than competitive nature. The first person was a very successful person during his studies, but when comes to his career period he became a failure as he doesn't know how to cooperate with people, how to work in groups, how to consider others. While the later, was an above average student in his studies, but he became a very successful person in his career field. He knows how to cope up with everyone, how to consider and help people during their needy times.
To put in a nutshell, I would like to inferred that the best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, rather than competition. So that we can build up a fruitful younger generation for our society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 2, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... we should focus more on cooperation. People who only has competitive quality ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 316, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...career period he became a failure as he doesnt know how to cooperate with people, how ...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...younger generation for our society.
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'if', 'so', 'still', 'while']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.220532319392 0.240241500013 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.152091254753 0.157235817809 97% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0874524714829 0.0880659088768 99% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0342205323194 0.0497285424764 69% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0722433460076 0.0444667217837 162% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.133079847909 0.12292977631 108% => OK
Participles: 0.0228136882129 0.0406280797675 56% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.84553995976 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0532319391635 0.030933414821 172% => OK
Particles: 0.0152091254753 0.0016655270985 913% => OK
Determiners: 0.0608365019011 0.0997080785238 61% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0152091254753 0.0249443105267 61% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0304182509506 0.0148568991511 205% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1407.0 2732.02544248 52% => OK
No of words: 238.0 452.878318584 53% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.91176470588 6.0361032391 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.58838876751 86% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.357142857143 0.366273622748 98% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.235294117647 0.280924506359 84% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.172268907563 0.200843997647 86% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.126050420168 0.132149295362 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84553995976 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 219.290929204 59% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546218487395 0.48968727796 112% => OK
Word variations: 52.2070356729 55.4138127331 94% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6194690265 53% => OK
Sentence length: 21.6363636364 23.380412469 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1201542538 59.4972553346 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.909090909 141.124799967 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6363636364 23.380412469 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.545454545455 0.674092028746 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 45.1657754011 51.4728631049 88% => OK
Elegance: 1.45588235294 1.64882698954 88% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.480105927163 0.391690518653 123% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.122111556622 0.123202303941 99% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.129300623222 0.077325440228 167% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.581129853036 0.547984918172 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.199678813414 0.149214159877 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182885692422 0.161403998019 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.209655998291 0.0892212321368 235% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.248555799056 0.385218514788 65% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0306404233131 0.0692045440612 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.341983954342 0.275328986314 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.207488825276 0.0653680567796 317% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.4325221239 58% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.30420353982 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 7.22455752212 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.66592920354 27% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 13.5995575221 74% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 41.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.