"The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition."
" The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance"-Socrates. We human-beings are thriving in this world primarily because of our intelligence. The prompt asserts that the best avenue for the preparation of the young demographic for all aspects of life is to inject a sense of cooperation, not competition. I mostly agree with this contention for two reasons, although I do concede, in some situations, competition is needed.
Firstly, Education is the backbone of every nation. The young people who are reading in schools,colleges, and even in university should be cooperative. Only by seeking help from others and helping others who need them, the students have the ability to grow not only in academia but also as a better human-being. For example, there are tons of group projects handed down to the students in schools and universities in which cooperation is must. If the students in a certain group project eschew from cooperation and complete it according to their own path. Then, there will not be any coherence in their project, most possibly, they will get a bad grade, but most importantly the cooperation which is the ultimate goal of group project failed absolutely. Another example, reasearch groups in universities have the objective of writing up academic papers for journals. Almost all the papers have several authors. Thus, avoiding cooperation to write a paper is almost impossible. Whether one like it or not, cooperation is a must in writing up academic papers for journals.
Secondly, In other sectors such as government or industry, cooperation has no other substitutes. The young demographic will oneday be the leaders in eclectic departments of a government. They will have to make decisions which may impact the whole nation. For example, one nation may need fossil fuel as it lacks the natural resources. But if the nation does not want to cooperate with others, then it is next to impossible to import fossil fuel from other countries/nations. Furthermore, Stringent leaders most of the time make bad decisions as they rely solely on their nation and their egotist behavior. They do not think of the benefit of the people of their nation leading to non-cooperative behavior towards other nations which results in a trading cut off between the nations or violent disputes. Therefore, it is imperative to have a sense of cooperation among the young demogrpahic.
However, there are some situations or scenarios where cooperation leads to less growth and competition is needed. For example, in schools or universities, it is not good to rely solely on cooperation all the time. If a particular problem is given to the students, it is a must to try to solve the problem on their own to have the necessary growth in their particular field and their intelligence. Another example, it is not always the best decision for a nation to be cooperative with other nations which are making controversial decisions such as environmental issues t.
In conclusion, it is imperative to have cooperation among the young people, even if it has some negative aspects. Mostly there are good outcomes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 96, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , colleges
... young people who are reading in schools,colleges, and even in university should be coope...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 273, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
...oblem is given to the students, it is a must to try to solve the problem on their own ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s given to the students, it is a must to try to solve the problem on their own to...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2623.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 514.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10311284047 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76146701107 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16526920314 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.461089494163 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 829.8 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.8081974437 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6785714286 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3571428571 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92857142857 5.21951772744 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243463260795 0.243740707755 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644005857965 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592172161493 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13569584163 0.150359130593 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404618406585 0.0667264976115 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.