The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignoring negative ones.
Every person has a different capability or ability to learn, their strengths and interests differ from one another. Lack of actions in one part doesn't mean the person is not capable of doing something noble. The prompt recommends that praising the positive actions and ignoring the negative ones is the best way to teach. In my opinion, I strongly agree with the suggestion and argue that the negative side should be kept as a trivial one and taken the positive vibe from that.
To begin, praising a person is a significant inspiration for a student, whatever he or she did is negative. That will help to focus further improvement, he or she will always try to get more praise by doing more improvement in actions. For example, if a student isn't good at math, he or she will always try to avoid this subject. If he or she is advised as he or she can do some math, practicing more will be beneficial to do more math, it will be worked to involve him or doing more practice. So, focusing on positive actions is works as a motivation for learning more.
In addition, focusing on negative actions can hinder the progress of students. When they always think about negativity, the success of their life falls into darkness. They will try to hinder themselves from others, go to in frustration for the fear of criticism. There are many cases of suicide for failure in the exams and give up from the actions because of the negativity. For teaching in a good way, negative actions should be ignored and learn from the mistakes to avoid them in future actions.
However, someone can tell that negative actions are also worked as motivation in a counter way, it can stimulate more aggressively. But how they are good if ones' mental condition falls in a depression and he or she trying to overcome it? So the more appropriate thing is that praising positively.
To conclude, it is clear that negative actions are detrimental to teach and positive actions are stimulation to improvement. Considering these discussions, it is the best way to teach praising the positive actions, negative actions should be ignored as they can hamper the development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ne another. Lack of actions in one part doesnt mean the person is not capable of doing...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 262, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...t in actions. For example, if a student isnt good at math, he or she will always try...
^^^^
Line 4, column 79, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a counter way" with adverb for "counter"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...e actions are also worked as motivation in a counter way, it can stimulate more aggressively. Bu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, for example, in addition, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1768.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 372.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75268817204 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72341414818 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483870967742 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.8729805922 60.3974514979 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.0526315789 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5789473684 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52631578947 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402760691721 0.243740707755 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151011328013 0.0831039109588 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.201732786836 0.0758088955206 266% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280459346647 0.150359130593 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.18907464288 0.0667264976115 283% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.