Claim: Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system.
Reason: Laws cannot change what is in people's hearts or minds.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
True, that there are some problems and loop holes in the contemporary legal system, but problems of the modern society is not beyond the scope of this laws. The claim is refutable and the reason provided for the claim is under-developed as well. Several arguments can be provided to refute the claim.
To begin with, laws might fail to change the malevolent desires that people already have in their hearts, but it can pursue commonplace citizen to abide by morals, when they are exposed to situations when personal interests or rage might obfuscate one's judgement. Laws might not be able to teach about morals, and they are not supposed to anyways, but they daunt by punishments.
Additionally, some laws might be obsolete and out dated, but they can never be useless, formulating new laws takes time and exhausting analysis for serving what is just. The modern society might face some unprecedented problems but it can rest assured that justice will be served sooner. For instance, the cyber crime, in the beginning of 19th century no one would have ever imagined that crimes and and criminals stealing money, data and identity virtually will flourish in the 21st century. In Contrast to the statement, the development of these cyber crime investigation departments have proven that legal systems indeed keep up with the modern society.
Moreover, those who believe that people who are determined to do what they have precluded, might condone the fact that legal systems have indeed pursued several criminals to give up in tensed situations. For evidence, hostage situation counselors, these the people who have the job of negotiating with the criminals in hostage situations, are living example of law changing what people have in their minds.
However, we all are aware of certain mishaps from the past, no matter what laws we formulate, those who have given up on their lives do succeed in their malevolent plans, from vehicle attacks to mass shootings this decade has seen it all in United States. This indeed is beyond laws can prevent. It is agreeable to some extent that people who have suffered some serious lass in their dignity, identity of mental acuteness, succeed even after knowing that they will be getting major punishment sentences, exist. But this is beyond any systems control. Only until a vigilance system that could prevent such attacks comes into existence.
Conclusively, the role of law is complex in modern society, those who are determined to achieve what they want at the cost of their lives do fall beyond the scope of law, but the actual job for which law and legal systems have been established, which is to server justice to people, is being achieved.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 147, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...dern society is not beyond the scope of this laws. The claim is refutable and the re...
^^^^
Line 3, column 249, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...sonal interests or rage might obfuscate ones judgement. Laws might not be able to te...
^^^^
Line 5, column 397, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...ne would have ever imagined that crimes and and criminals stealing money, data and iden...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
anyway, but, however, moreover, so, well, for instance, in contrast, in contrast to, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2254.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 449.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02004454343 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55741361205 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516703786192 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 702.9 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.0262133222 60.3974514979 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.588235294 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4117647059 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76470588235 5.21951772744 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233529124875 0.243740707755 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814613970416 0.0831039109588 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492700532673 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134377193843 0.150359130593 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511423890454 0.0667264976115 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.