The author announces that everybody who wants to get a college or university degree should be free of any charges and this is the government who should afford it all. In my point of view this statement has two side for evaluating and I have reasons that why some should pay and why some shouldn’t.
I am the supporter of the author statement in case of poor young people who really want to know more and have an interval beside their hard work in order to do something for their own intellectual progress, but they have not the opportunity for continuing their education just because of adversity. Those who encounter with this problem, have not any fault themselves, as they could be grown up in an environment where they never felt what poverty meant. In this case the only chance is the government who can take the responsibility which their parents couldn’t behold. By doing this, government will alleviate the taste of misfortune to those innocent young adults and settle the state of being hopeful in society.
Another group of students who I have an active pleading on behalf of them are talented students. As they have a congenital acumen, they should make use of it. By using their mental keenness, they will be the cause of beneficial advances which will have mutual benefits, in such a way that they can nourish their aptitude in a most suitable and positive way; besides, using their talents leads to inventions which certainly will make the society a better place to live in. If the government isn’t able to distinguish their potentials and doesn’t manage to make use of them in an apropos way, they will make use of their unique abilities in an abominable way and I think this responsibility is on the behalf of any civilized government who values differences between right and wrong.
The group of youth who I am not agreed with the author and they should pay tuitions, are middle and upper class groups of young students who can easily afford the education fees. In this case, the limitations for continuing their educations are anything except money. So if they want to do something for broadening their knowledge, they can do it selectively. Instead, the government can save some of its budget for constructing purposes as the fees received by this group of society will somehow act as a help to government and also it can be a distribution of wealth in society which the distance from affluence and adversity will be shortened.
To abridge my words, no governmental rule should be in an absolute concept and it should have some exceptions as we live in a world with different people with different situations, but an analogous issue – “the right to live happily and hopefully”. Making the right decisions is upon the government as the governor of society who can provide that held in common right, properly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 582, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an apropos way" with adverb for "apropos"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...doesn't manage to make use of them in an apropos way, they will make use of their unique abi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 646, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an abominable way" with adverb for "abominable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...will make use of their unique abilities in an abominable way and I think this responsibility is on t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'besides', 'but', 'if', 'really', 'so', 'i think']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.235294117647 0.240241500013 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.137867647059 0.157235817809 88% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0661764705882 0.0880659088768 75% => OK
Adverbs: 0.03125 0.0497285424764 63% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0716911764706 0.0444667217837 161% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.121323529412 0.12292977631 99% => OK
Participles: 0.0257352941176 0.0406280797675 63% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.80096743565 2.79330140395 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0220588235294 0.030933414821 71% => OK
Particles: 0.00183823529412 0.0016655270985 110% => OK
Determiners: 0.112132352941 0.0997080785238 112% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0404411764706 0.0249443105267 162% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0349264705882 0.0148568991511 235% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2860.0 2732.02544248 105% => OK
No of words: 490.0 452.878318584 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.83673469388 6.0361032391 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70488508055 4.58838876751 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.318367346939 0.366273622748 87% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.230612244898 0.280924506359 82% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.183673469388 0.200843997647 91% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.142857142857 0.132149295362 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80096743565 2.79330140395 100% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 219.290929204 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491836734694 0.48968727796 100% => OK
Word variations: 57.1142284389 55.4138127331 103% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6194690265 73% => OK
Sentence length: 32.6666666667 23.380412469 140% => OK
Sentence length SD: 104.465539241 59.4972553346 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 190.666666667 141.124799967 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.6666666667 23.380412469 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.466666666667 0.674092028746 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 55.7278911565 51.4728631049 108% => OK
Elegance: 1.58778625954 1.64882698954 96% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281768232906 0.391690518653 72% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.11787280877 0.123202303941 96% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0561794936932 0.077325440228 73% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.572494194568 0.547984918172 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.16369450367 0.149214159877 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118719868192 0.161403998019 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705912715192 0.0892212321368 79% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.384434629042 0.385218514788 100% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.075312473446 0.0692045440612 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205081493698 0.275328986314 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550693221935 0.0653680567796 84% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.30420353982 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 7.22455752212 125% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.66592920354 27% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.5995575221 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.