Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field

Essay topics:

Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.

In spite of the fact that nowadays knowledge of different fields has divided so much that one easily gets too frustrated by his own major to step into another one, the cross-link among disciplines are more intensive than ever. There is no denying that an expert of one field is capable of giving constructive judgement of works in that field. Yet opinions from outside can sometimes generate unexpected inspirations and even bring about revolutionary changes to the whole field. Nonetheless, significance of such opinions differs in various disciplines.

In the study of nature science, although ex...

*** The full content of this essay is available to VIP readers

Subscribe as testbig VIP readers and get unlimited access to essays on the top list.

Votes
Average: 9.4 (5 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

the cross-link among disciplines are more intensive
the cross-link among disciplines is more intensive

popular episodes and styles, which was regarded as heterodoxy
popular episodes and styles, which were regarded as heterodoxy

Sentence: Conclusively, critical judgement of work coming from outside can generate unanticipated influence to a field and therefore plays an inneglectable role, yet its importance varies in diverse disciplines.
Error: inneglectable Suggestion: No alternate word

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 22 15
No. of Words: 425 350
No. of Characters: 2360 1500
No. of Different Words: 251 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.54 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.553 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.101 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 181 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 148 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 109 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 82 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.318 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.245 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.545 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.297 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.485 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.064 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5