Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people whom they serve.
The government officials are elected by the people to work for the people. Hence, they are liable to hear the opinions of people before making any major decisions. The author suggests that government officials should rely on their judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people whom they serve which is not logically correct. I do not agree with the author on his argument due to the reasons given below.
In any democratic country, the politicians are elected by the people directly or indirectly. The decisions made by these politicians are liable to the people. By considering people will there is a better chance of making the right decisions because the decisions are taken for the benefit of the people. For instance in any area where there is a lack of water and basic needs require for living. If people of this area will not be consulted than then how officials will know what they need? It will be no use if the government will build a big shopping mall there.
If government officials would not hear people's wish then it would be a big blow to democracy. The system would become Dictatorship. There will be no thought of people's benefit and corruption will be at the peak. In case, the government will take action without taking people in consensus, if this decision backfires and causes loss to the nation and people then in this scenario the nation can witness large protests and rallies. Hence, it is always better to take note of people's will before making any big decisions.
However, there are some cases in which government officials should act according to their judgment. In any country's foreign policy and financial decisions are made by the expert people sitting in various government institutions. There is a possibility that the people of country A hates country B and they want war with country B. So, in this case, the officials should thaught and brainstorm before making any decisions. What will happen if country A completely relies on country B for various resources? Hence, the decision should be in the interest of the country not only based on the will of people.
In conclusion, officials should hear the will of people where necessary and when specific expertise is needed before coming to any decision then they should go according to their judgment or go to the experts for advice.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ll build a big shopping mall there. If government officials would not hear peo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, so, then, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.6327345309 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.9520958084 185% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 11.1786427146 98% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 28.8173652695 69% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 55.5748502994 97% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 16.3942115768 79% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1953.0 2260.96107784 86% => OK
No of words: 401.0 441.139720559 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87032418953 5.12650576532 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.56307096286 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59986035877 2.78398813304 93% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 204.123752495 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.426433915212 0.468620217663 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 602.1 705.55239521 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.22255489022 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 19.7664670659 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.5723020128 57.8364921388 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.7727272727 119.503703932 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2272727273 23.324526521 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.59090909091 5.70786347227 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.67664670659 257% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383594991783 0.218282227539 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116602257892 0.0743258471296 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136526969393 0.0701772020484 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242326753115 0.128457276422 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11880871344 0.0628817314937 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 14.3799401198 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.3550499002 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.197005988 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.5979740519 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.32208582834 88% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 98.500998004 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 12.3882235529 69% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.