Governments should offer college and university education free of charge to all students.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Education is a basic necessity in the developing world. Not only can a educated person is respected in the society but also contributes for the greater good. Free education will no doubt help country develop. But it may also cause problems in terms of quality education. Therefore, the idea of making college and university education free would ultimately land the government in many difficulties.
The primary consequence of making education free would be impact on the wealth of the country. In the country where the population is very large, providing enough resources to make the education free would be a difficult task. For example, a country like India is home to 1.5 billion people. If he government of India decides to provide free education, it will be difficult to build schools in proportion with population. Colleges require proper infrastructure along with good laboratories. As the budget of government would be limited, it would be difficult to build quality laboratories and maintain them. Hence, the quality of education will decline if good infrastructure is not made available.
Moreover, if the government fails to pay the teachers sufficient enough, then the quality of education would be immensely affected. To elucidate, the college which pay very less to its staff in order to compensate the free education been provided would have. Therefore, the teachers might not want to give their 100% and ultimately may even resign. So, in order to make sure teachers stay interested and do not quit they should be paid handsomely. And this is difficult for government to observe.
However, the free education can serve as golden opportunity for the poor students and help them educate. Many children in Africa and Asia are forced to do child labour. Free education can be the source to eradicate child labour. People will send their children to schools and colleges instead of making them work. Hence, free education can be beneficial in some aspects.
Nonetheless, the cons of free education outweigh the pros. Free education will ultimately decrease the quality of education. Also, the teaching staff and teaching conditions won't be good. Hence, government should not provide free education.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 70, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...y in the developing world. Not only can a educated person is respected in the soc...
^
Line 2, column 576, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., it would be difficult to build quality laboratories and maintain them. Hence, t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, so, then, therefore, for example, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 33.0505617978 36% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 12.9106741573 209% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1858.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 356.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2191011236 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8483367683 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483146067416 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 23.0359550562 56% => Sentence length is too short
Sentence length SD: 28.4054801363 60.3974514979 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 71.4615384615 118.986275619 60% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.6923076923 23.4991977007 58% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.88461538462 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153344326195 0.243740707755 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0518298507286 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351993482612 0.0758088955206 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100159800765 0.150359130593 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0134770007806 0.0667264976115 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 48.8420337079 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 12.4 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 11.2143820225 64% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to improve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.