Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.
Every year, the price of college tuition increases. Even with scholarships, there are those who cannot afford to attend college. It would be beneficial to offer free university education to those students who cannot afford it, but ultimately it is best that the policy is not implemented.
It is best that the policy is not implemented because it will put others at a disadvantage and create a shortage in the work force. For those who can afford the tuition, they would be paying for the same education that some are getting for free. If everyone ends up getting university education, why should some people pay and others don’t? Although it is disadvantageous for those who cannot afford university education, the others are making an economic investment. This conflict can be assuaged by making use of federal grants and loans, which are catered to those who cannot afford education and can alleviate the burden. Also if the policy is implemented, then there would be a decline in plumbers and electricians, as people can become engineers and doctors for free. This leads to a broken society. These consequences are why the policy should not be implemented.
Despite these consequences, it is understandable why the policy should be implemented. For some, they would be the first one in their family to get a higher education. It can break the pattern of poverty; they would be able to provide for themselves and their family a brighter future. The promise of a brighter future however, is not worth the societal conflicts implementation of the policy would inflict
In summation, the consequences of implementing the policy outweigh the benefits, therefore making it logical for the government to not offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...est that the policy is not implemented. It is best that the policy is not implem...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 627, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...education and can alleviate the burden. Also if the policy is implemented, then ther...
^^^^
Line 3, column 872, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y the policy should not be implemented. Despite these consequences, it is unders...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 355, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'conflicts'' or 'conflict's'?
Suggestion: conflicts'; conflict's
...ture however, is not worth the societal conflicts implementation of the policy would infl...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, then, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.6327345309 112% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.9520958084 154% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 11.1786427146 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 28.8173652695 94% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 55.5748502994 45% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 14.0 16.3942115768 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1535.0 2260.96107784 68% => OK
No of words: 303.0 441.139720559 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06600660066 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.56307096286 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93819098544 2.78398813304 106% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 204.123752495 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475247524752 0.468620217663 101% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 705.55239521 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 4.96107784431 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.5310695769 57.8364921388 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.333333333 119.503703932 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 23.324526521 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.70786347227 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380265300082 0.218282227539 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124460198658 0.0743258471296 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145469036161 0.0701772020484 207% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.32165067893 0.128457276422 250% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.238388797322 0.0628817314937 379% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.3799401198 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.3550499002 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.5979740519 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.32208582834 96% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 98.500998004 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 12.3882235529 73% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.