Technology is the core of the civilization of human beings. One can tell human from other kinds of animals from witnessing the marvelous artworks created by technology all over the world. We don’t need thick feather like bears to keep themselves warm in the cold winter, for we invent air-conditioners to keep us warm in the winter season. On the other hand, the development of technology also does a lot of harm to the environment of the earth and to human themselves. The global warming caused by over emission of CO2 may eventually make people live near the sea coast of the continent leave their home to other places because of the rising sea level. So you can see whether to restrict the development or the research of technology is a highly controversial issue. But in my last analysis, I am inclined to support the argument asserted by the issue.
Without restriction, there will be more Funds supports and collaborations of different scientific institutes, which will make more rapid the development of science research and benefit people’s living quality. Nowadays, it is becoming much difficult for us to develop scientific research. Hundreds of years ago, it was quite easy for scientists to make great contribution to the world with performing simple scientific experiments. The ingredients and equipment you require to perform an experiment of validating Coulomb’s law can be easily purchased on the website and with nothing complex concept or calculations. But just take a quick look to the problems which scientists are figuring out nowadays: Gene therapy, the detection of Gravitational wave, Nano-material… These problems or projects are all huge monsters that impossible for one man to solve like early years. To figure out these monsters require the collaboration of thousands of scientists and pretty expensive experiment equipment. Take Gene therapy and nanomaterial as an example, if scientists figure out these two problems then we will have two completely effective ways to treat cancers. By using gene therapy to redress bad cancer cells from gene therapy or building Nano-robots to let them perform surgeries directly in the human bodies, cancer to us in the future will just like cold to us today.
Not all of the inventions, however, derived from technology are conducive to humans. On Oct. 9th, 1941, shortly before U.S government entered the Second World War, President Franklin D.Roossevelt approved the program to develop an atomic bomb. The scientist, J. Robert Oppenheimer took over the program and started off delving into the nuclear bombs. Eventually, he succeed in building two nuclear bombs and the U.S dropped these two into the two cities of Japan, killing thousands of Japan citizens and polluting the environment of Japan severely. Two bombs can make countless casualties and cause inviolable damage to environment, but what if the government doesn’t restrict the development and use of nuclear bombs. What if people treat nuclear bombs as merchandises that can be sold to other countries or private organizations to make profit? We can’t imagine what will happen if this situation comes to true. So when it comes to weapons and military stuff, to restrict the development and research on these things is really correct and necessary, but with sensible management, supporting and not restricting the developing of science is a good choice.
In general, despite the fact that abuse of technology may bring humans catastrophe, the government should support more and restrict less on the development and research of science, using the blade of technology carefully to create better life for all of us.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 327, Rule ID: THE_FALL_SEASON[1]
Message: Use simply 'winter'.
Suggestion: winter
...ent air-conditioners to keep us warm in the winter season. On the other hand, the development of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 480, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'performing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: performing
...e ingredients and equipment you require to perform an experiment of validating Coulomb&apo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 5, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ill just like cold to us today. Not all of the inventions, however, derived from techn...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 122, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...ns. On Oct. 9th, 1941, shortly before U.S government entered the Second World War...
^
Line 5, column 186, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Roossevelt
... Second World War, President Franklin D.Roossevelt approved the program to develop an atom...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 367, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'succeeds'.
Suggestion: succeeds
... into the nuclear bombs. Eventually, he succeed in building two nuclear bombs and the U...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 415, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...in building two nuclear bombs and the U.S dropped these two into the two cities o...
^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'really', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'in general', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.269696969697 0.240241500013 112% => OK
Verbs: 0.130303030303 0.157235817809 83% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0893939393939 0.0880659088768 102% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0333333333333 0.0497285424764 67% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0318181818182 0.0444667217837 72% => OK
Prepositions: 0.113636363636 0.12292977631 92% => OK
Participles: 0.030303030303 0.0406280797675 75% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.00492455378 2.79330140395 108% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0424242424242 0.030933414821 137% => OK
Particles: 0.00757575757576 0.0016655270985 455% => OK
Determiners: 0.0924242424242 0.0997080785238 93% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0212121212121 0.0249443105267 85% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0121212121212 0.0148568991511 82% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3677.0 2732.02544248 135% => OK
No of words: 589.0 452.878318584 130% => OK
Chars per words: 6.24278438031 6.0361032391 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.92639038232 4.58838876751 107% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.385398981324 0.366273622748 105% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.315789473684 0.280924506359 112% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.227504244482 0.200843997647 113% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.16298811545 0.132149295362 123% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00492455378 2.79330140395 108% => OK
Unique words: 309.0 219.290929204 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524617996604 0.48968727796 107% => OK
Word variations: 66.2061757163 55.4138127331 119% => OK
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6194690265 116% => OK
Sentence length: 24.5416666667 23.380412469 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.400396824 59.4972553346 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.208333333 141.124799967 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5416666667 23.380412469 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.674092028746 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.21349557522 134% => OK
Readability: 56.1206140351 51.4728631049 109% => OK
Elegance: 2.11627906977 1.64882698954 128% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105349015522 0.391690518653 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.129794272414 0.123202303941 105% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0728855687857 0.077325440228 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.517298362192 0.547984918172 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.164510476431 0.149214159877 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.04803095042 0.161403998019 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478976673154 0.0892212321368 54% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.455212477974 0.385218514788 118% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0128696139363 0.0692045440612 19% => Paragraphs are so close to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0919833101424 0.275328986314 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363308028833 0.0653680567796 56% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.4325221239 125% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.30420353982 151% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 11.0 7.22455752212 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 3.66592920354 191% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 20.0 13.5995575221 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.