It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
In the contemporary era, there are many people who claim that there can be no here given the fact that famous figures are investigated in detail by various sorts of media. Furthermore, as the internet has developed, the spread of information has been wider and faster. In this situation, any flaw of celebrities is easily and immediately detected and that is why many people argue that societies cannot consider someone with flaws as a hero. While this idea has some valid points, I think a society can still have a hero and there are clear benefits from believing in the presence of heroes.
As mentioned above, it is reasonable to state that any sorts of flaws or scandals related to famous people are quite accessible to all and sundry. Therefore, it is logical to suppose that people would be disappointed with such defects no matter how they have admired the achievements and behaviors of their former heroes. This phenomenon has been found in many places, especially related to political figures. It is usual nowadays that candidates for elections are faced with a myriad of attacks as their faults are revealed by the media despite their former good reputation.
However, this example cannot validate the idea that a living man or woman cannot be a hero anymore. In contrast, people have always maintained their belief in the heroes regardless of any defamation. In some cases, this sort of support even becomes a religious sentiment. This phenomenon is not limited to the past. Even these days, we can witness that many famous figures have reserved their reputation despite the faults of them uncovered by the media or the leaked materials, such as recordings or videos, on the internet. For example, Steve Jobs has been revered by a lot of people because of his contribution to the development of smartphones and other electric devices although his problematic personality has been widely known. Jobs’ followers keep silent about his rude behaviors to the employees and misconducts with his former partners. Similarly, many sports stars have been seen as heroes for many fans despite their misbehaviors. For some football fans, Karim Benzema, a famous football player of Real Madrid, is still a hero although he intimidated his teammate with an illegally recorded video.
Besides, there is no need for society to find a hero among famous people. In contrast, it has been an old trend that a society boasts a specific group of people as true heroes. For instance, firefighters have been described as the heroes in our neighborhood. Ordinary people who just work diligently everyday have also been illustrated as real heroes. This sort of depiction has widely been accepted by other ordinary people and this sort of hero making is beneficial for society. By this process, a society can encourage the members of it to resemble the heroes so that the society can prosper. Besides, the sort of optimism made by this propaganda is helpful for normal people to believe in the positive functions of a society. Given this situation, it cannot be said that making someone a hero is difficult.
In conclusion, it is true that the flaws and defects of famous people are easily found nowadays and some people would refrain from considering them as heroes. However, that is not always the case. As aforementioned, many celebrities have preserved their reputation because of specific performances. Their other problems can be ignored by the supporters in this case. In addition, heroes can also appear from normal people and societies have exploited this procedure. Therefore, we cannot conclude that heroes cannot appear anymore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In the contemporary era, there are many ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m believing in the presence of heroes. As mentioned above, it is reasonable to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...despite their former good reputation. However, this example cannot validate th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mate with an illegally recorded video. Besides, there is no need for society to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 312, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...rdinary people who just work diligently everyday have also been illustrated as real hero...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at making someone a hero is difficult. In conclusion, it is true that the flaws...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, similarly, so, still, therefore, while, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, sort of, such as, in some cases, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 34.0 19.5258426966 174% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 33.0505617978 172% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3031.0 2235.4752809 136% => OK
No of words: 600.0 442.535393258 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05166666667 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.94923200384 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73864879498 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 215.323595506 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.441666666667 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 977.4 704.065955056 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 6.24550561798 256% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.2370786517 153% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.8486644786 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7741935484 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3548387097 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64516129032 5.21951772744 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129199532874 0.243740707755 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0393883770474 0.0831039109588 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0324766304749 0.0758088955206 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0822768008926 0.150359130593 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232323308032 0.0667264976115 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 150.0 100.480337079 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.