laws should not be rigid or fixed. they should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, places and times. Do you agree or disagree?
The author of the issue embraces the idea that laws should be flexible enough to take time, many conditions, place into consideration in order to have a fair judgment. Due to the controversial nature of this question, there is not a general argument on this issue. However, the popular sentiment to which I vehemently cling is that if laws become inflexible, no more fair judges would be available in any given society. The underlying aim of this essay is to put forward some cogent reasons to shed light on a number of issues in this framework.
To commence with, there is no doubt that law is the basic principles of our day to day life. Hence, the behavior of people in any given nation should not go beyond the line confined by laws. Broadly speaking, laws are strong weapons to maintain peace and harmony in all around the globe, so, a flexibility of laws play a consequential role in the society and they should be able to consider time, place, various consequences and so forth. As a tangible example, it has to be considered whether a person has made an offense deliberately, intentionally, or made for some personal gain, just for fun or other things. If we neglect such situations and make decisions based on fixed laws, the judgment will not be valuable and penetrable enough to distinguish whether a person is guilty or not. To elucidate more on this issue, we have to take different conditions into account in order to have a flourished and thrived laws and help the society not falling behind the fixed law.
Another equally salient point in corroborating my stance is the fact that many laws have to change at a very swift pace according to time in order to prevent a disaster from coming up. If we take a minute to ponder over it, majorities of couples in China have the right to have only one child. This one-child law has now created some problem for the total population of China and the government decided to change it as soon as possible. In fact, natural disasters like earthquake, flood, diseases and so forth, are able to diminish the number of the population drastically. So, it is necessary for the government in China to shift the one-child law. It can be deduced from a combination of breadth of coverage and depth of detail that laws should not only be flexible but also capable enough to change with time and place in order to face many trials and tribulations successfully.
However, what was alluded to above can't be overgeneralized to all contexts. Along with the innumerable benefits it has, indisputably, fixed laws are always helpful and useful and they contribute greatly to the reduction of problems in any particular society owing to the fact that they are able to discern whether a person is guilty or not, in any circumstance, time and place. However, it was a story in a nutshell; actually, there are more reasonable grounds that can lend weight to my viewpoint.
In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 36, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
.... However, what was alluded to above cant be overgeneralized to all contexts. Alo...
^^^^
Line 9, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, hence, however, if, so, as to, broadly speaking, in fact, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 83.0 58.6224719101 142% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2452.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 517.0 442.535393258 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74274661509 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76839952204 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77418937068 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 215.323595506 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512572533849 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 799.2 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.9043415279 60.3974514979 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.6 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.85 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.35 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251519768515 0.243740707755 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682217292365 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798770132177 0.0758088955206 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12274832161 0.150359130593 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0765455764745 0.0667264976115 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.