Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The statement put forward by the author, in my view is generalized, yet equally true, but to some extent. Research is constant quest to find the answers, to unanswered question. There has been in various instances, where the discoveries and inventions took place accidentially, while the research statement was something else, but this is not always true there are researhces which are carried out systematically, with proper problem statement and even the answers are found out. Thus it cannot be generalized that all discoveires have happened accidentially.
There has been discoveries, for instance, discovery of Newtons laws of gravitation. While sitting below the apple tree, newton was unaware, neither was is sitting to perform an experiment nor he was aware about what discovery he was about to make, so one can claim that newton discovered gravity accidentially, but other side of story is, though he was pondering about "why did the apple fall in downward direction?", it is equally true that, for formulating the final equation of newtons law of gravitation, he obviously researched, wether is there any documentation about this phenomenon, or wether somebody was already working on this problem. It is obvious that the mechanics was not discovered by newton, there were other scientist, for example, Euler, Gallelio, who were already working on mechanics before newton.
The discovery about dinasours fossils were obviously not made intentionally, it was a scientist who was studying geology, accidentially discovered the fossils of dinasours, where he study about the rock. Even the discovery of X-ray was made accidentially by Mr. Runtgen, who kept the photographic plate below the radioactive material an discovered about the X-rays. There are certain instances were scientist constantly strive for research problem, by doing a systemic study, like the one of Higg's Boson particle, to prove the theory a large paricle collider is being setup in Geneva. The discovery of higg's boson particle is obviously not accidential.
In conclusion, it can be said that, yes there are discoveries and invention which happened accidentially, and will obviously going to happen in future, but the to formulate the theory, a scientist will have to follow a systematic procedure.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 481, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ent and even the answers are found out. Thus it cannot be generalized that all disco...
^^^^
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'studies'.
Suggestion: studies
...ered the fossils of dinasours, where he study about the rock. Even the discovery of X...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 335, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ic plate below the radioactive material an discovered about the X-rays. There are ...
^^
Line 4, column 127, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'go'
Suggestion: go
...pened accidentially, and will obviously going to happen in future, but the to formula...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 143, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...lly, and will obviously going to happen in future, but the to formulate the theory, a sci...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 35.0 19.5258426966 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1938.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 358.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41340782123 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10368884222 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54469273743 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 613.8 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 136.353986822 60.3974514979 226% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 161.5 118.986275619 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8333333333 23.4991977007 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 5.21951772744 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0878566646038 0.243740707755 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0366803304359 0.0831039109588 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394034285166 0.0758088955206 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0634800688328 0.150359130593 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479853313071 0.0667264976115 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 14.1392134831 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 48.8420337079 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.69 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.