Mass media and the internet have caused people’s attention spans to get shorter. However, the overall effect has been positive: while people are less able to focus on one thing, they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through large quantities of information and find what’s important.
In our modern society there ia a question about the role of mass media and the internet arising. Some people claim that despite the fact that attention of viewers/users to some infromation became shorter they started to choose and to sort needed information out of all. To a certain extent this claim sounds realistic, however there are also challenges that should be overcome.
First of all, let condsider the postive effects of the both mass media and the internet. The information became too enomorous in quantity and people start to find information that is essential for them. According to some researchers information that is not just read or heard, but got in the process of filtering is much more useful for the user as it is information that he or she eagered to get. Moreover, large quantities of information lead to the situation when in business people have to advance their technologies to analyze information (in business it has got a name of Big Data) and, therefore, such spheres and objects of science as machine learning, OLAP-cubes and etc. are improving in order to be able to comprehence the data.
On the other side, there are a lot of drawbacks. For instance, many students do learn their professional disciplines, but just memorize where they can find information about them. Some of them use such encyclopedias as Wikipedia that provide rather useful, but not always accurate information. That may be a problem for future generations that they are losing their abilities to remember and to be attentive to the details. Moreover, there may be a result of political polarization of society due to so called fragmentatization. What does it mean? It means that people start to watch that mass media that provides information from the point of view of some political party and usually such information is biased. Therefore, many people watching different biased news may become trully uninformed about what is really happening in the country and that may lead even to civil wars as we can observe in Syria and Ukraine.
To conclude, it is inevitable that the quantity of information provided by mass media and the internet is increasing. What is much more important that besides the advantages of the advanced technologies which made this happen there are problems that society has to solve in order to prevent polarization and other bad effects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 369, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'overcome'?
Suggestion: overcome
...here are also challenges that should be overcome. First of all, let condsider the pos...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 222, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'researchers'' or 'researcher's'?
Suggestion: researchers'; researcher's
...s essential for them. According to some researchers information that is not just read or he...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 671, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...science as machine learning, OLAP-cubes and etc. are improving in order to be able to co...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'besides', 'but', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'really', 'so', 'therefore', 'as to', 'for instance', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.224824355972 0.240241500013 94% => OK
Verbs: 0.177985948478 0.157235817809 113% => OK
Adjectives: 0.07962529274 0.0880659088768 90% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0491803278689 0.0497285424764 99% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0421545667447 0.0444667217837 95% => OK
Prepositions: 0.117096018735 0.12292977631 95% => OK
Participles: 0.0257611241218 0.0406280797675 63% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.88507199949 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0491803278689 0.030933414821 159% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0866510538642 0.0997080785238 87% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.016393442623 0.0249443105267 66% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0281030444965 0.0148568991511 189% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2370.0 2732.02544248 87% => OK
No of words: 395.0 452.878318584 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.0 6.0361032391 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.58838876751 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.33417721519 0.366273622748 91% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.26835443038 0.280924506359 96% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.2 0.200843997647 100% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.149367088608 0.132149295362 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88507199949 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 219.290929204 93% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518987341772 0.48968727796 106% => OK
Word variations: 57.4404036608 55.4138127331 104% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6194690265 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.9444444444 23.380412469 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.6050721725 59.4972553346 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.666666667 141.124799967 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9444444444 23.380412469 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.833333333333 0.674092028746 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 48.7798874824 51.4728631049 95% => OK
Elegance: 1.3652173913 1.64882698954 83% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311728404028 0.391690518653 80% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0999475443449 0.123202303941 81% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0684150706891 0.077325440228 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.497501265211 0.547984918172 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.180505806705 0.149214159877 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135966315055 0.161403998019 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069962112401 0.0892212321368 78% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.473285852698 0.385218514788 123% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0485395158507 0.0692045440612 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246883027004 0.275328986314 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334422187695 0.0653680567796 51% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.4325221239 58% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.30420353982 38% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88274336283 205% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 5.0 7.22455752212 69% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 8.0 2.70907079646 295% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.5995575221 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.