A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer.
It is widely accepted that one of the aim of education of education is to make an individual capable of leading their lives in the society in a manner which is harmless and hopefully, beneficial to others. Apart from this, education also plays a significant role in teaching us our evolution, history and existence at the place where we lead our lives. It provides the historical continuity to the
In this context, homogenization of the curriculum negatively affects the preservation of our diversity by not acquianting students with the provincial and local aspects of the state they reside in. We can take vernacular languages for example, in the case of countries where different languages are spoken in different provinces like India, Pakistan, Spain, Canada, etc. Imposing a uniform national curriculum without giving the scope for teaching the language of the land would lead to the loss in numbers of those who can fluently write in that language (though they can speak) and can lead to extinction of the finer features of these languages which have developed throughout centuries.
Another field of study which would take a hit is the regional history. Each geographical territory has a tale of how the natives started settling there, the battles fought in that region and possibly, the sacrifices made by the ancestors to defend it. These fables of history need to be trickled down to the young generations to develop in them, a sense of belonging towards their place of birth. Their would be lesser scope to teach regional history in a uniform national curriculum.
To those who argue that a same national curriculum would place all the students on an equal footing for future opportunities, I contend that the fields of study which are objective in nature like science and mathematics can be made uniform but humanities and social sciences curriculum require a more thorough deliberation. Moreover, a varied and custom curriculum suitable to the provincial or city level provides the scope to students to develop their extra-curricular interests well suited to that region or otherwise. For instance, a student can get a top class theatre education in New York while someone else living in Silicon Valley can hone their technical skills by taking advantage of the technological environment over there.
So, in conclusion, I would posit that imposing a uniform curriculum on a dicerse body of students can be detrimental to the regional languages and history and can be done in the field of objective sciences at be
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 43, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'of education'.
Suggestion: of education
... is widely accepted that one of the aim of education of education is to make an individual capable of lea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 398, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rovides the historical continuity to the In this context, homogenization of the c...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 267, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sciences'' or 'science's'?
Suggestion: sciences'; science's
... made uniform but humanities and social sciences curriculum require a more thorough deli...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'well', 'while', 'apart from', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in conclusion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.247191011236 0.240241500013 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.134831460674 0.157235817809 86% => OK
Adjectives: 0.085393258427 0.0880659088768 97% => OK
Adverbs: 0.038202247191 0.0497285424764 77% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0426966292135 0.0444667217837 96% => OK
Prepositions: 0.139325842697 0.12292977631 113% => OK
Participles: 0.0449438202247 0.0406280797675 111% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.90701141645 2.79330140395 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0359550561798 0.030933414821 116% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.123595505618 0.0997080785238 124% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0314606741573 0.0249443105267 126% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0202247191011 0.0148568991511 136% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2533.0 2732.02544248 93% => OK
No of words: 416.0 452.878318584 92% => OK
Chars per words: 6.08894230769 6.0361032391 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.58838876751 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.377403846154 0.366273622748 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.307692307692 0.280924506359 110% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.228365384615 0.200843997647 114% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.153846153846 0.132149295362 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90701141645 2.79330140395 104% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 219.290929204 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526442307692 0.48968727796 108% => OK
Word variations: 59.6484525558 55.4138127331 108% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6194690265 63% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 23.380412469 137% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.1079893644 59.4972553346 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 194.846153846 141.124799967 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0 23.380412469 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.846153846154 0.674092028746 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 62.7692307692 51.4728631049 122% => OK
Elegance: 2.0 1.64882698954 121% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375964317157 0.391690518653 96% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.117399913357 0.123202303941 95% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0480811645145 0.077325440228 62% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.620634674698 0.547984918172 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.167093407068 0.149214159877 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182052297773 0.161403998019 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743314449486 0.0892212321368 83% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.42892171216 0.385218514788 111% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0225100348631 0.0692045440612 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261758480628 0.275328986314 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054532819931 0.0653680567796 83% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.4325221239 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 7.22455752212 97% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 13.5995575221 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.