Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
When it comes to how a nation should make use of its wilderness areas, people\'s views tend to be ambivalent. In the history, some nations have suffered from the consequences of over-exploitation of natural resources. As far as I am concerned, wilderness areas need to be protected, but in statement that any of them should be preserved by law.
Foremost, there is no doubt that wilderness areas are invaluable treasure for a country. Not only are they reservoirs of natural resources, but also play a significant role in environment. For example, over-exploitation of forests can lower the humidity of local areas, while causing severe soil loss at the same time. In addition, natural forests are a mysterious place yet to be studied. Many of the unrecognized plants there may be source for novel drugs. Sacrificing these natural resources for higher GDP and unban development is nothing but myopic. This becomes even more imperative in the case of rare species and natural resources, the preservation of which is of both environmental, economic and strategic significance.
What is more, protecting the remaining wilderness areas in their natural state can also be lucrative. Thanks to the development of cities, most people now lead a convenient and comfortable life in urban areas, but this has also made them avid for wilderness. Therefore, wilderness regions has become extremely popular destinations for tourists, making it an ideal choice for government to combine nature preservation with tourism. The revenue from tourism can serve as part of the funding for the preservation, easing the financial pressure for government, and boost local economy simultaneously.
However, totally prohibiting people from harnessing natural resources can also be devastating. Firstly, a nation\'s economy cannot overwhelmingly rely on the third industry like tourism, so it is necessary to use natural resources for manufacturing and exporting purposes. In fact, cautiously designed and well-organized exploitation of natural resources can be condusive. For instance, cutting big trees in the forest can open up a window for smaller ones to receive sufficient sunshine and water, making them growing faster. Similarly, proper fishing can also ease the competition within the fish population and let the population thrive sustainably, according to ecological theories.
Due to aforementioned, protection of wilderness areas by law is absolutely necessary, especially in cases when rare species and resources are involved. At the same time, rational exploitation of nature is also expected and actually unavoidable for any economy entity. Thus, I clear see no neccessity to put any wilderness regions of a nation under the protection of laws.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 65, Rule ID: ABSOLUTELY_ESSENTIAL[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessary'.
Suggestion: necessary
...rotection of wilderness areas by law is absolutely necessary, especially in cases when rare species ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, similarly, so, therefore, third, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in fact, no doubt, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2321.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 423.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48699763593 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25171611735 2.79657885939 116% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581560283688 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 755.1 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.740449438202 270% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5450849943 60.3974514979 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.5 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2272727273 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.09090909091 5.21951772744 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308405458013 0.243740707755 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091242980044 0.0831039109588 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550157129297 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181135996715 0.150359130593 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05009177864 0.0667264976115 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 48.8420337079 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 100.480337079 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.