Nations should suspend govt. funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry and unemployed.
The author in the above issue talks about suspending government funding for arts for the welfare of the hungry and unemployment. Accordingly, I persist on being of the opinion that mere suspension for funding for arts will not be best option for welfare of the citizens. There are multiple reason for my disagreement with this authors view. I shall endeavour my perceptions for the above paragraph.
Firstly, The above statement indicates that we should stop funding for the arts with consideration to the welfare of the citizens. But as the above statement suggest, We cannot take it for the granted that there will be hike in the number of the employment and hungry. However, A specific survey must be carried out for the funding in arts thereby taking this brutal step.
Secondly, As Tourism plays a vital role in the nation economy. If we stop funding of the arts the tourism will also be get effected thereby resulting into the lack of symmetry in national income. An appropriate survey of the dependence on the tourism must be made to make an decession. Art tend to be the beauty of any nation, being the real gem. Relinquishing them may bring an end to the Indian culture. Also, funding fails to give an assurance regarding the welfare of people
Thirdly, Government should carry out a specific survey for the investment done on different resources of art to that of the result obtain due to this. Yet additional investment would not play a major role in contribution. However, the government should stop funding for by such resources the national income would be saved. Eventually, Development of the Nation lies in the development of the Art. So It may give a major effect for the welfare of the nation. But on this assumption, We cannot risk for the nation.
Thus to wrap discussion over this issues, consolidating all the perspectives in one, I would like to say that all the decision should be taken by government to fight the national problems have to be very careful and must be conscious only after observing all the thing in one, all the aftereffects of what will be there after decision. And As they suggest, abandoning of arts funding should be considered as the last option.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'be the best'.
Suggestion: be the best
...uspension for funding for arts will not be best option for welfare of the citizens. The...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 323, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ultiple reason for my disagreement with this authors view. I shall endeavour my perc...
^^^^
Line 3, column 63, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ays a vital role in the nation economy. If we stop funding of the arts the tourism...
^^
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...nce on the tourism must be made to make an decession. Art tend to be the beauty of...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...mption, We cannot risk for the nation. Thus to wrap discussion over this issues, co...
^^^^
Line 5, column 30, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e nation. Thus to wrap discussion over this issues, consolidating all the perspecti...
^^^^
Line 5, column 315, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: thereafter
...e, all the aftereffects of what will be there after decision. And As they suggest, abandoni...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['accordingly', 'also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'regarding', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'third', 'thirdly', 'thus', 'as to']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.223557692308 0.240241500013 93% => OK
Verbs: 0.141826923077 0.157235817809 90% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0673076923077 0.0880659088768 76% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0456730769231 0.0497285424764 92% => OK
Pronouns: 0.03125 0.0444667217837 70% => OK
Prepositions: 0.151442307692 0.12292977631 123% => OK
Participles: 0.0504807692308 0.0406280797675 124% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.74385020484 2.79330140395 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0264423076923 0.030933414821 85% => OK
Particles: 0.00240384615385 0.0016655270985 144% => OK
Determiners: 0.137019230769 0.0997080785238 137% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0480769230769 0.0249443105267 193% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.00480769230769 0.0148568991511 32% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2201.0 2732.02544248 81% => OK
No of words: 379.0 452.878318584 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.8073878628 6.0361032391 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.58838876751 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.324538258575 0.366273622748 89% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.253298153034 0.280924506359 90% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.171503957784 0.200843997647 85% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.12401055409 0.132149295362 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74385020484 2.79330140395 98% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 219.290929204 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.472295514512 0.48968727796 96% => OK
Word variations: 49.9062717009 55.4138127331 90% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.95 23.380412469 81% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.2823317333 59.4972553346 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.05 141.124799967 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.95 23.380412469 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8 0.674092028746 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.21349557522 134% => OK
Readability: 44.2798153034 51.4728631049 86% => OK
Elegance: 1.94505494505 1.64882698954 118% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31045973782 0.391690518653 79% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.1252025097 0.123202303941 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0712336742195 0.077325440228 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.582541246849 0.547984918172 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.167006379802 0.149214159877 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141530098444 0.161403998019 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080741915039 0.0892212321368 90% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.503558171906 0.385218514788 131% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0823781246724 0.0692045440612 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234847713867 0.275328986314 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688700470167 0.0653680567796 105% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.4325221239 48% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.30420353982 207% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 7.22455752212 55% => OK
Negative topic words: 10.0 3.66592920354 273% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 13.5995575221 125% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.