"In order to improve the quality of instruction at the college and university level, all faculty should be required to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach."
Some top universities and colleges require their faculty members to work outside of academic world in the aim of practicing viable issues, accordingly, being qualified with more valuable factual experiences and advises further than theoretical background. Importance of academic world and some possible inefficient time allocations of this***policy aside, I agree with this application since we observe positive feedbacks from graduates of these school.
While some particular jobs are based on market strategies, recent technologies and innovative ideas, it is not rational to charge students with just burden of theoritical stuff. To put it another way, the key of success in some fields is keeping up ongoing speed and changes rather than bonding and özümsemek old theories. There a good academic will be the one who can give concrete real advises. For instance, a good colleague in advertisement, Bob Johnson, has given many lectures and during these period has worked on various agents to observe what is going on. This is important in the sense that student can adapt more easily and get aroused by feeling ready to directly involve into market. Otherwise, in their first jobs, they may feel unqualified or impractical, althought they realize somethings just get time in further.
Recent studies show that colleges which invole theory intense educations become successful in research methodologies but fail in corporate and public sectors. Theory is full of assumptions, conditions in the aim of getting desired results, effects, however, real life have far more convoluted obstacles instead. It is important to learn also how you can face and fight with these obstacles and how you partner with your colleagues in these process of risk management. Most academics are not able to give real life illustrations even though they can immensely explain and develop proof and logic of theory. For instance, a proper civil engineering academics should be able to give possible unfortunates and they manage this process. This illustrates that civil engineer academic should involve in construction areas in order to observe meticulously.
Last point I agree with the statement that this application also feeds and rises new research areas since scholars will see some problems to resolve or ameliorate, accordingly, they could give advices their students new questions, new technics to work on. For instance, most famous scholar of architecture in Turkey, Deniz Yılmaz, who is currently giving lectures in Istanbul Technical University, has a habit of giving her students projects which require their students to contemplate and provide a solution for a current challenge in architecture of Turkey rather than designing discrete buildings. This improves practice of students and serves as an opportunity to apply what they have learned.
On the other hand, this application may cause some problems in time managements of these academics since it is not easy all the time to conduct and concentrate on a research effectively, therefore, allocating efficient time to these professional occasions may decrease
In conclusion, all things considered, I agree with the statement beyond its possible negative drawbacks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ssues, accordingly, being qualified with more valuable factual experiences and ad...
^^
Line 8, column 75, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent that this application also feeds and rises new research areas since scholars ...
^^
Line 8, column 165, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... some problems to resolve or ameliorate, accordingly, they could give advices the...
^^
Line 10, column 269, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hese professional occasions may decrease In conclusion, all things considered, I ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2733.0 2235.4752809 122% => OK
No of words: 498.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48795180723 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72397222731 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94014100378 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 285.0 215.323595506 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572289156627 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 855.9 704.065955056 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.3172252554 60.3974514979 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.833333333 118.986275619 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6666666667 23.4991977007 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146556143429 0.243740707755 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0471096690682 0.0831039109588 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473331423716 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.077170311058 0.150359130593 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450399601796 0.0667264976115 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 14.1392134831 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 48.8420337079 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.38706741573 119% => OK
difficult_words: 159.0 100.480337079 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.8971910112 134% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.