In order to produce successful original work, scholars and scientists must first study the successful work of others to learn what contributions remain to be made.
The successful work created by great scholars and scientists plays an important role is knowing about the later studied and help develop new theories. The present day scholar or scientist should have a basis on which they would like to study. For this purpose the former work has to be taken in to account. For producing Original Work a scholar, or scientist needs to understand various factors and aspects that would contribute to his work. The detail study of the past work would bring a closure to people working on it and it helps to understand disparate theories of the past. however, one should not completely get lost in such process and be convinced by what was produced earlier. Rather the scholars and scientists should consider as a part of the study which would be useful for their work.
When a scientist is trying to produce a new theory in a specific realm, he would have to do a detail research to understand the previous theories and clarify his qualms if any. This would help he go beyond what is known or discover what was never known before. The great worked has helped many times in history to come up with new theories which act as a foundation. Had he not studied the erstwhile work, he would not question the relative theories and go further. This is useful to produce a contemporary work and make new inventions. However, accepting completely with the previous theories would deter the present scientific worker and they might consequently lose vigor. Keeping this in mind, only the ground of the theories should be considered rather than being carried away by it.
In some fields it is very important to study the past literature. For example a person must study all the musical ragas or traditional music to produce work in the same field. One cannot produce similar work without knowing the previous literature in that field. One more such example would be the Newton's Mechanic theory. His theory had been very useful and has also helped to create the quantum theory which relied on Newton's theory. Additionally, the proposed parts were compelling were easy to produce with the help of the old theories that were already available. for example, In the past, the theory proposed by Lenardo da vinc regarding the parachute flight has been taken in consideration and further studied were done on that topic and now we have parachutes and other objects that fly in the sky with relation to this theory. As evidenced the study of the previous work would influence what one wants to produce now.
However, the are many theories and inventions that are not based on any former theories and yet were successful. For instance, we can consider the most primitive scientists who had very less sources to any kind of literature or we can say they had no background studied available on a specific realm. Yet, there were very insightful and determined and produced inspirational work that has helped humans evolve over the years. So this cannot be totally ruled out.
All said and done, the previous work is any field would help as a source to produce a new theory, however, one should not be completed swayed away by the theories but rather, take them as a base for their study to be more efficient and effectual.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The successful work created by great scholars and scien...
^^
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: NON_ACTION_CONTINUOUS[3]
Message: The verb know is usually not used with a continuous form, use the simple form instead. Suggestion: 'knows'
Suggestion: knows
... and scientists plays an important role is knowing about the later studied and help develo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... and scientists plays an important role is knowing about the later studied and help develo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 322, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to be taken in to account. For producing Original Work a scholar, or scientist ne...
^^
Line 1, column 584, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...erstand disparate theories of the past. however, one should not completely get lost in ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 691, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...convinced by what was produced earlier. Rather the scholars and scientists should con...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 732, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ather the scholars and scientists should consider as a part of the study which wo...
^^
Line 5, column 572, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
... theories that were already available. for example, In the past, the theory propos...
^^^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...t one wants to produce now. However, the are many theories and inventions that are n...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 187, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun sources is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... most primitive scientists who had very less sources to any kind of literature or we...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'consequently', 'however', 'if', 'regarding', 'so', 'while', 'as to', 'for example', 'for instance', 'kind of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.188429752066 0.240241500013 78% => OK
Verbs: 0.198347107438 0.157235817809 126% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0925619834711 0.0880659088768 105% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0611570247934 0.0497285424764 123% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0330578512397 0.0444667217837 74% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0859504132231 0.12292977631 70% => OK
Participles: 0.0561983471074 0.0406280797675 138% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.51564238966 2.79330140395 90% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0347107438017 0.030933414821 112% => OK
Particles: 0.00330578512397 0.0016655270985 198% => OK
Determiners: 0.112396694215 0.0997080785238 113% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0363636363636 0.0249443105267 146% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0247933884298 0.0148568991511 167% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3246.0 2732.02544248 119% => OK
No of words: 560.0 452.878318584 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79642857143 6.0361032391 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.8645985582 4.58838876751 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.335714285714 0.366273622748 92% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.253571428571 0.280924506359 90% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.166071428571 0.200843997647 83% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0928571428571 0.132149295362 70% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51564238966 2.79330140395 90% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 219.290929204 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.453571428571 0.48968727796 93% => OK
Word variations: 53.7503410426 55.4138127331 97% => OK
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6194690265 131% => OK
Sentence length: 20.7407407407 23.380412469 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7722934625 59.4972553346 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.222222222 141.124799967 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7407407407 23.380412469 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.444444444444 0.674092028746 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.21349557522 192% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 46.0978835979 51.4728631049 90% => OK
Elegance: 1.12994350282 1.64882698954 69% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.418774332403 0.391690518653 107% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0818033809841 0.123202303941 66% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0675388612772 0.077325440228 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.485730344082 0.547984918172 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.149377581457 0.149214159877 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155969469096 0.161403998019 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0819365694012 0.0892212321368 92% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.384085332425 0.385218514788 100% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.130294480062 0.0692045440612 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.283510795321 0.275328986314 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0928388801726 0.0653680567796 142% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.4325221239 153% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.30420353982 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88274336283 205% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 16.0 7.22455752212 221% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.66592920354 27% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 9.0 2.70907079646 332% => OK
Total topic words: 26.0 13.5995575221 191% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.