In order to produce successful original work, scholars and scientists must first study the successful work of others to learn what contributions remain to be made.
The successful work created by great scholars and scientists plays an important role to about the later studied and help develop new theories.The present day scholar or scientist should have a basis on which they would like to study. For this purpose the former work has to be taken in to account. For producing Original Work a scholar, or scientist needs to understand various factors and aspects that would contribute to his work. The detail study of the past work would bring a closure to people working on it and it helps to understand disparate theories of the past. However, one should not completely get lost in such process and be convinced by what was produced earlier. Rather, the scholars and scientists should consider as a part of the study which would be useful for their work.
When a scientist is trying to produce a new theory in a specific realm, he would have to do a detail research to understand the previous theories and clarify his qualms if any. This would help he go beyond what is known or discover what was never known before. The great worked has helped many times in history to come up with new theories which act as a foundation. Had he not studied the erstwhile work, he would not question the relative theories and go further. This is useful to produce a contemporary work and make new inventions. However, accepting completely with the previous theories would deter the present scientific worker and they might consequently lose vigor. Keeping this in mind, only the ground of the theories should be considered rather than being carried away by it.
In some fields it is very important to study the past literature. For example a person must study all the musical ragas or traditional music to produce work in the same field. One cannot produce similar work without knowing the previous literature in that field. One more such example would be the Newton's Mechanic theory. His theory had been very useful and has also helped to create the quantum theory which relied on Newton's theory. Additionally, the proposed parts were compelling were easy to produce with the help of the old theories that were already available. For example, In the past, the theory proposed by Lenardo da vinc regarding the parachute flight has been taken in consideration and further studied were done on that topic and now we have parachutes and other objects that fly in the sky with relation to this theory. As evidenced the study of the previous work would influence what one wants to produce now.
However, the are many theories and inventions that are not based on any former theories and yet were successful. For instance, we can consider the most primitive scientists who had fewer sources to any kind of literature or we can say they had no background studied available on a specific realm. Yet, there were very insightful and determined and produced inspirational work that has helped humans evolve over the years. So this cannot be totally ruled out.
All said and done, the previous work is any field would help as a source to produce a new theory, however, one should not be completed swayed away by the theories but rather, take them as a base for their study to be more efficient and effectual.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The successful work created by great scholars and scien...
^^
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...r studied and help develop new theories.The present day scholar or scientist should...
^^^
Line 1, column 723, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ther, the scholars and scientists should consider as a part of the study which wo...
^^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...t one wants to produce now. However, the are many theories and inventions that are n...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'consequently', 'however', 'if', 'regarding', 'so', 'while', 'as to', 'for example', 'for instance', 'kind of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.187707641196 0.240241500013 78% => OK
Verbs: 0.196013289037 0.157235817809 125% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0946843853821 0.0880659088768 108% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0598006644518 0.0497285424764 120% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0332225913621 0.0444667217837 75% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0863787375415 0.12292977631 70% => OK
Participles: 0.0548172757475 0.0406280797675 135% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.53258310037 2.79330140395 91% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0365448504983 0.030933414821 118% => OK
Particles: 0.00332225913621 0.0016655270985 199% => OK
Determiners: 0.111295681063 0.0997080785238 112% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0365448504983 0.0249443105267 147% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0249169435216 0.0148568991511 168% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3231.0 2732.02544248 118% => OK
No of words: 557.0 452.878318584 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80071813285 6.0361032391 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.85807034144 4.58838876751 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.335727109515 0.366273622748 92% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.254937163375 0.280924506359 91% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.166965888689 0.200843997647 83% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0933572710952 0.132149295362 71% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53258310037 2.79330140395 91% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 219.290929204 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.456014362657 0.48968727796 93% => OK
Word variations: 54.0079892154 55.4138127331 97% => OK
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6194690265 126% => OK
Sentence length: 21.4230769231 23.380412469 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4489610808 59.4972553346 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.269230769 141.124799967 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4230769231 23.380412469 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.461538461538 0.674092028746 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 46.9167932606 51.4728631049 91% => OK
Elegance: 1.13793103448 1.64882698954 69% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.424964735802 0.391690518653 108% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0845231675843 0.123202303941 69% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0681351709476 0.077325440228 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.496731342242 0.547984918172 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.157845425238 0.149214159877 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161160083292 0.161403998019 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0869603703056 0.0892212321368 97% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.382159724953 0.385218514788 99% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.127178944826 0.0692045440612 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287010507561 0.275328986314 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0974658541097 0.0653680567796 149% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.4325221239 144% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.30420353982 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88274336283 205% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 15.0 7.22455752212 208% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.66592920354 27% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 9.0 2.70907079646 332% => OK
Total topic words: 25.0 13.5995575221 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.