Originality does not mean thinking something that was never thought before; it means putting old ideas together in new ways.
The base of the pyramid supports all the structure above it, similarly some unique, never thought before idea is required for supporting the other innovations. It cannot be said that originality is just putting old ideas together. If there are no new ideas, then there will not be a base to support other inventions and ideas. I will provide some examples and will shed more light on this topic in the passage below.
As, I already said, according to me, originality also means discovering innovative things and coming up with new unique idea. Everyone knows about satellites and how they are helping to revolutionize the technological world, society, and humankind around us. Rocket propulsion is the main part of Satellites launching procedure. Is rocket propulsion an originality, according to the definition mentioned, it is not. Rocket propulsion is not merely putting some old ideas together. It is something that was never thought before. So, originality does include thinking something that was never thought before. It also means coming up with something new and innovative. Hence, new ideas are required to come up with other inventions in the future. But just putting old ideas together is not the only definition of an Originality.
Furthermore, we can see example of Facebook and other social networks. These correctly fit into the definition of originality mentioned in the statement. They just put old idea of AOL, Orkut, etc. in a new way. But, as we can see, there was existing true original idea of social network that was developed by AOL which helped in development of other ideas. Thus, as we can see, new ideas are required for development of other ideas and originality also means thinking completely new things.
There are other places where humankind came up with new things by putting old ideas together, but these old ideas were not merely developed by putting some ideas. These were real, path-breaking ideas, which helped in the development of other inventions. Everyone knows about internet, we use it daily more than anything else. It was invented by DARPA, a military research organization of USA. But now we are using it for totally different purpose. As we can again see, internet was developed by putting old idea came up by DARPA. But, DARPA's idea is the base and is also and originality.
In my opinion, Originality means putting some old ideas together in new way and also coming up with new groundbreaking things. I disagree with the definition of Originality mentioned in the statement give to me.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 198, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a new way" with adverb for "new"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...y just put old idea of AOL, Orkut, etc. in a new way. But, as we can see, there was existing...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, similarly, so, then, thus, as to, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2132.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 422.0 442.535393258 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05213270142 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80993098418 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 215.323595506 87% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.445497630332 0.4932671777 90% => OK
syllable_count: 710.1 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1218703778 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.5172413793 118.986275619 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5517241379 23.4991977007 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8275862069 5.21951772744 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 21.0 4.83258426966 435% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414460021834 0.243740707755 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118072162905 0.0831039109588 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120330848279 0.0758088955206 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243731034184 0.150359130593 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104548509265 0.0667264976115 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 14.1392134831 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 48.8420337079 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.