Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the same time period, most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned with the station's coverage of weather and local news. In addition, several local businesses that used to run advertisements during our late-night news program have just cancelled their advertising contracts with us. Therefore, in order to attract more viewers to our news programs and to avoid losing any further advertising revenues, we should expand the coverage of weather and local news on all our news programs."
The author here is concerned with the loss of revenue and viewers along with complaints regarding the allocation of time for the national news and due to this factor the decision has been made to revert back to the local and weather report with the view to gain back the profit and the viewers. However, the claim from the author cannot be justified because he has simply co-related the events and assumed that what was beneficial previously would still be so which is not backed with any evidences. Similarly the argument has lot of loopholes and the incomplete evidences and wrong assumptions seriously compromise the conclusion to gain by reverting back to previous programmes.
The author has stated that the time allocated for the local news and weather reporting were cut and lengthened the national news but nowhere there is a reasoning why? Afterall what could be the possible reasons for doing so. We can simulate many scenarios: one could be the pressure from nation to do so. If such is the case can they simply overlook the nations call and do what the author thinks would be beneficial to them. The author must back his reasons to do so and then only he can be validated.
There is a statement of having complaints about the coverage of the local news and weather reporting but again he fails to mention where are the complaints coming from in what numbers and by what age group. what if the complaints are quite few in between, from the people who do not often watch tv. In such scenario heeding to such complaints and doing what they want may not prove beneficial. If the author has quite profounding number of complaints wanting the old programme back for more amount of times and from the people who are regular viewers, only then the authors decision to go back would no go in vain.
Along with dealing with complaints another important thing for any tv programme is advertising. The author gives a statement that there has been cancelation in the advertising contract again why? we have no idea. It may be due to plummeting reputation of the tv channel. If the reason is such no matter what programme you bring back the progress is minimal. If the author brainstorms us with enough backing that the advertisers are certain to agree if they increase the time of local and weather reports then only his point would be worth mentioning and reasonable.
At last one major fallacy is correlating the past and the future events. There are many variables that have an effect on the scene. He suppose all other factors will not matter and what is beneficial in the past would be a hit again in the present time. He fails to convince us by giving us the foregrounds. He might do so by giving some hard proof that all other factors are still the same and in fact other events has been successful, then only he can validate his point..
In the nutshell. it seems obvious that what was a success in past will be now. However, due to various reasons and variables that is not the result. But on the positive side, if the author do some research on what was the shortcoming before and what might be the possible solutions that can be implemented. The decision is worth a shot and might become a success putting aside all the troubles and pebbles in the way.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 501, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...which is not backed with any evidences. Similarly the argument has lot of loopholes and t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 634, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s seriously compromise the conclusion to gain by reverting back to previous progr...
^^
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: AFTERALL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'after all'?
Suggestion: After all
...s but nowhere there is a reasoning why? Afterall what could be the possible reasons for ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 208, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: What
... in what numbers and by what age group. what if the complaints are quite few in betw...
^^^^
Line 5, column 241, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun in seems to be countable; consider using: 'few ins'.
Suggestion: few ins
...group. what if the complaints are quite few in between, from the people who do not oft...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 197, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
... in the advertising contract again why? we have no idea. It may be due to plummeti...
^^
Line 7, column 272, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...lummeting reputation of the tv channel. If the reason is such no matter what progr...
^^
Line 9, column 136, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'supposes'.
Suggestion: supposes
...es that have an effect on the scene. He suppose all other factors will not matter and w...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 309, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nvince us by giving us the foregrounds. He might do so by giving some hard proof t...
^^
Line 9, column 473, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...ful, then only he can validate his point.. In the nutshell. it seems obvious th...
^^
Line 11, column 18, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...alidate his point.. In the nutshell. it seems obvious that what was a success i...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'regarding', 'similarly', 'so', 'still', 'then', 'in fact']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.201298701299 0.240241500013 84% => OK
Verbs: 0.173701298701 0.157235817809 110% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0795454545455 0.0880659088768 90% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0698051948052 0.0497285424764 140% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0357142857143 0.0444667217837 80% => OK
Prepositions: 0.105519480519 0.12292977631 86% => OK
Participles: 0.0503246753247 0.0406280797675 124% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.49423661939 2.79330140395 89% => OK
Infinitives: 0.025974025974 0.030933414821 84% => OK
Particles: 0.00324675324675 0.0016655270985 195% => OK
Determiners: 0.126623376623 0.0997080785238 127% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0340909090909 0.0249443105267 137% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0340909090909 0.0148568991511 229% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3275.0 2732.02544248 120% => OK
No of words: 581.0 452.878318584 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63683304647 6.0361032391 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.90957651803 4.58838876751 107% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.289156626506 0.366273622748 79% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.220309810671 0.280924506359 78% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.154905335628 0.200843997647 77% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.103270223752 0.132149295362 78% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49423661939 2.79330140395 89% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 219.290929204 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.426850258176 0.48968727796 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 50.700685052 55.4138127331 91% => OK
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6194690265 136% => OK
Sentence length: 20.75 23.380412469 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.7492547539 59.4972553346 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.964285714 141.124799967 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 23.380412469 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.392857142857 0.674092028746 58% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 5.21349557522 211% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 42.7809810671 51.4728631049 83% => OK
Elegance: 1.27906976744 1.64882698954 78% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.417812427672 0.391690518653 107% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0976906040588 0.123202303941 79% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0628472935725 0.077325440228 81% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.539875223544 0.547984918172 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.164155802685 0.149214159877 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155801812456 0.161403998019 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103373072589 0.0892212321368 116% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.469240054605 0.385218514788 122% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0765885077684 0.0692045440612 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.294033750958 0.275328986314 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0808061836284 0.0653680567796 124% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.4325221239 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.30420353982 170% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88274336283 143% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 7.22455752212 125% => OK
Negative topic words: 8.0 3.66592920354 218% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.70907079646 185% => OK
Total topic words: 22.0 13.5995575221 162% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.