As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Some people claim that nowadays technologies are particularly advanced, which allows humans to stop thinking for themselves and rely on machines in each sphere of people’s life. On the contrary, other people are quite sure that there is no way computer technologies supplant necessity of humans’ ability to think. Undoubtedly, this issue is controversial. However, a closer examination reveals that the first opinion given is way more convincing for several reasons.
One reason in support of my point of view is that we cannot spend a day without referring to technologies, and it is an undeniable fact that such advanced technologies free us from thinking even on secure computations such as an amount of money we have to pay for our purchases. For many people perhaps it is complicated to remember the last time they have computed something themselves because every time they had to do it, they could use a calculator, which made all the necessary computations itself.
One may argue that people need to check on calculations or conclusions computers make, which leads to the conclusion that humans cannot help but think for themselves, even it is only required for rechecking of computations. However, this claim seems to be not persuasive. If scientists had checked each outcome, technologies would not have made such a big step forward as it would have required an enormous amount of time. Therefore, that claim can be weakened easily.
Perhaps the best reason in support of my position is that now computers can do things which cannot be understood even by scientists. There is a convincing example that can illustrate this reason. A little time ago one of the scientists invented the quantum computer that was meant to make discoveries. However, nobody still can comprehend how exactly computer makes such findings. As a result, we can say that technologies are becoming so involved that it is impossible to maintain their development, and we can do nothing but rely on computer intellect.
In summary, while there are arguments to be made for both sides, it is clear that there are greater advantages to reasons in favor of the claim that technologies free people from thinking for themselves.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, while, in summary, such as, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1862.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 363.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12947658402 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99694638763 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537190082645 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.429458281 60.3974514979 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.375 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6875 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.21951772744 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22672862804 0.243740707755 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679242349846 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0831610927933 0.0758088955206 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14145399538 0.150359130593 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112730985425 0.0667264976115 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.