As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Today technology is an indispensable and inseparable aspect of everyday life. Needless to say (there is no need to say that) various kind of technologies make life easier such as the use of Internet and computers. Whether technology undermines the human mental capabilities or not, is a question, the answer of which has been a controversial matter among philosophers. To a great extent, I believe that technology hardly causes problem-solving deterioration in human/mankind ) and its advantages outweigh its disadvantages.
Every technology is designed and invented by human and till now, almost most of the technology is dependent on persons for being controlled or performing tasks. Therefore, the idea that technology makes people think less is not reasonable since the need to do the duty through any technology needs a person. and everybody who are dealing with new technology instead of old methods, should learn how to do their works by the new technology or devices. Considering an accountant as an example, nowadays he does his job by using computer and many applications such as spreadsheets of Ms-Office as a simplest one or maybe a complicated ERP module. So the aforementioned accountant is obliged to learn new kinds of stuff and try to use them efficiently instead of doing some paper-based calculation by using old-fashioned calculators. This process of learning new things means using his mental ability. In addition to this, many people are still looking and searching for new methods and changing new technology to better one in order to help them do their tasks easier or more rapidly, that's why technology is growing rapidly; In the above example, new financial applications with new facilities are releasing every year. All these conditions show that technology is not a means to do human’s tasks instead of them, rather is helping them to not waste their time by doing mundane tasks.
As mentioned above, technologies save human precious time leading to having enough time to learn more about other majors and improvise new technology. The interdisciplinary fields, getting more popular day by day, are good evidence of the fact that technology makes people think more and also try to be more innovative. For example, medical devices such as x-ray for tomography are used to map the human body’s density variation, in other words, to show body organs by sending many waves from different paths to a body and collect them after passing it. Then, other scientists and researcher in the field of geology used the basis of this technology to find out more about the properties of oceans and finally they made a new technology: ocean acoustic tomography. How could this be possible, if technology precludes human of thinking or weaken his abilities?
On the other hand, it is not possible to hide the fact that technology makes people lazy. For example, more people use their/his cell-phone calculator to do the basic math instead of the mind. Likewise, more students use their computer spell-checker for correcting the word pronunciation and less try to learn the correct pronunciation of a word. Although, these are the bad side of a technology, using technology make people have more time to do what they want or what they are good at. In the example above, maybe the student who uses spell-checker have a potential to be a great musician; by using the technology he could save his time to practice more music and be more successful in future.
To conclude, It is good to mention that every technology has his good and bad sides like everything else in the world. And it is up to human how to use it. But overall, not only the technology makes life easier but also help people think effectively and help them have better performance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aspect of everyday life. Needless to say there is no need to say that various kin...
^^
Line 1, column 474, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m-solving deterioration in human/mankind and its advantages outweigh its disadvan...
^^
Line 2, column 308, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
... through any technology needs a person. and everybody who are dealing with new tech...
^^^
Line 2, column 594, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ns such as spreadsheets of Ms-Office as a simplest one or maybe a complicated ERP...
^
Line 2, column 859, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'things'' or 'thing's'?
Suggestion: things'; thing's
...lculators. This process of learning new things means using his mental ability. In addi...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1082, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
... do their tasks easier or more rapidly, thats why technology is growing rapidly; In t...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 685, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ctice more music and be more successful in future. To conclude, It is good to mention th...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, likewise, look, may, so, still, then, therefore, for example, in addition, kind of, such as, in other words, on the other hand, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 29.0 14.8657303371 195% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 84.0 58.6224719101 143% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3143.0 2235.4752809 141% => OK
No of words: 625.0 442.535393258 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0288 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.0 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98634160136 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 298.0 215.323595506 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.4768 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 1014.3 704.065955056 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6583038252 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.72 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76 5.21951772744 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188765585966 0.243740707755 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610148172704 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382958462816 0.0758088955206 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116335701708 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335076045333 0.0667264976115 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 138.0 100.480337079 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.