As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Reliance on technology effects human thinking. We are living in a time where phrases like "smart phones, dumb people" are quite common. However, technology acts as a support to fight against the crisis that we face today. Technology has enabled people to think more creatively, accurately and thus contribute towards overall well being of society in a much efficient way.
Technology has opened up our minds to a space which was previously unconcieved, thus helping in development of a safer enviornment. We hear of a new research being done almost every other day, all these research are mostly for a safer enviornment for humans and their existence. A recent study which was published in New york times demonstrated how playing american football is associated with brain disformation and increases the chances of having mental illness. Signs of which get visible mostly after the age of thirty. There were alarming number of professional players of american football who at the age of fifty, or maybe earlier are on medication. This report led to banning the head bang in most schools, while playing football.
Technology make us more creative, and divert our mind into more useful things, more things that could contribute towards betterment of society. We know that wheels were invented way back in time, do we see anyone working to make the same wheel again?. Technology is now enabling to find a solution to increasing accidents, and traffic. Autonomous cars are being developed based on the antediluvian wheels. One day, we will see a safer road and self-driven cars.
Excessive use of technology, that has no or ver little benefit deteriotes our thinking capacity and intellect. Smart Phones are to be blamed partly for such a damage. People blindly believe what they see on social media and won't even check for the actuality before responding. There has been numerous such cases which lead to violent upheavel, begining from social media.
To sum it up, though technology has acted as a catalyst for destruction of humans intellect and has made us more addictied to it, upto a extent we can't even imagine our life without it. However, technology plays a bigger pivotal role in the development of society and acts as a precursor to the future world. A world comprised of less accidents and a better prospectus can be achieved only with our reliance on technology.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 39, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... Excessive use of technology, that has no or ver little benefit deteriotes our th...
^^
Line 7, column 158, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'damage'.
Suggestion: damage
...Phones are to be blamed partly for such a damage. People blindly believe what they see o...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 136, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... has made us more addictied to it, upto a extent we cant even imagine our life wi...
^
Line 9, column 148, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... more addictied to it, upto a extent we cant even imagine our life without it. Howev...
^^^^
Line 9, column 331, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun accidents is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... the future world. A world comprised of less accidents and a better prospectus can b...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'thus', 'well', 'while']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.244897959184 0.240241500013 102% => OK
Verbs: 0.179138321995 0.157235817809 114% => OK
Adjectives: 0.092970521542 0.0880659088768 106% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0612244897959 0.0497285424764 123% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0430839002268 0.0444667217837 97% => OK
Prepositions: 0.108843537415 0.12292977631 89% => OK
Participles: 0.0680272108844 0.0406280797675 167% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.7732163727 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0272108843537 0.030933414821 88% => OK
Particles: 0.00453514739229 0.0016655270985 272% => OK
Determiners: 0.0702947845805 0.0997080785238 71% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00680272108844 0.0249443105267 27% => Some modal verbs wanted.
WH_determiners: 0.0226757369615 0.0148568991511 153% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2389.0 2732.02544248 87% => OK
No of words: 395.0 452.878318584 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.04810126582 6.0361032391 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.58838876751 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.372151898734 0.366273622748 102% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.281012658228 0.280924506359 100% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.19746835443 0.200843997647 98% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.136708860759 0.132149295362 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7732163727 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 219.290929204 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625316455696 0.48968727796 128% => OK
Word variations: 79.0908038116 55.4138127331 143% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6194690265 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.9545454545 23.380412469 77% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8375510544 59.4972553346 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.590909091 141.124799967 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9545454545 23.380412469 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.363636363636 0.674092028746 54% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.21349557522 96% => OK
Readability: 46.0558112773 51.4728631049 89% => OK
Elegance: 1.488 1.64882698954 90% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390782968695 0.391690518653 100% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0683315830552 0.123202303941 55% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0528577176279 0.077325440228 68% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.444682866048 0.547984918172 81% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0932608403796 0.149214159877 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116360479655 0.161403998019 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059542524524 0.0892212321368 67% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.185111285049 0.385218514788 48% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0264984137541 0.0692045440612 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23755244733 0.275328986314 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047734731014 0.0653680567796 73% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.4325221239 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.30420353982 132% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88274336283 123% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 7.22455752212 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 13.5995575221 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.