People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Everyday are people challenged by making thousands of decisions. Sometimes those decisions are small and not worth thinking a long time about it. But in some cases we have to make decisions where choices have a great impact. In those cases it's important to think twice and not make a decision purely on the first emotion which covered up. In this situation or only guide is emotion which often gives our biased information which leads to a negative outcome.
Impulsive people are making often decisions in a second without thinking about the results. In many situations, a handling does not have one variable. To weight all of those variables you can not truly trust your first glance. You have to give yourself time to weigh all of those variables individually and afterwards make up a conclusion by overseeing the situation.
In addition an example. The Dutch government made plans to build a railway from western to the eastern part of the country. Because of pressure from local institutions, the government decide to start building without proper plans. While they contract many companies to accomplish the task they realise that there were some logical problems. If the government did not only make a decision on the emotion to help commuters quickly by building a new railway. They had saved millions of euros and costs on lawsuits.
Decision making based on emotions does not fit in our western society. We learn our student to give reliable and substantiated arguments instead of saying: ''because I think so''. We learn them to think about topic a discuss this topic with other students. After all, students have to oversee a the different views and make a conclusion based on facts.
To summarise, Impulsive actions do not often lead to an optimal situation. For sure in situations with multiple options and choices. Also in bigger plans where there are a lot of stakeholders decisions based on logic and statistics are recommended.
There is nothing wrong with having emotions on a topic but decisions do also have a part where thinking is more important than feeling.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...sion by overseeing the situation. In addition an example. The Dutch government made p...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 232, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...to start building without proper plans. While they contract many companies to accompl...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 342, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... that there were some logical problems. If the government did not only make a deci...
^^
Line 7, column 212, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... so. We learn them to think about topic a discuss this topic with other students. After a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 290, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'a' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: a; the
...ts. After all, students have to oversee a the different views and make a conclusion b...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, while, after all, i think, in addition, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.4196629213 8% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1741.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 349.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98853868195 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67140926317 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535816618911 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.7910105007 60.3974514979 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.6956521739 118.986275619 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1739130435 23.4991977007 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78260869565 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285040352897 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744865956598 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615190705439 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140906126545 0.150359130593 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548710752782 0.0667264976115 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 14.1392134831 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.8420337079 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.07 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.