People's attitudes are determined more by their immediate situation or surroundings than by society as a whole.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Regardless of the location, the unspoken rules of society deeply shape how people act and react to any kind of situation. Indeed, society can be somewhat defined as the silent judge of our actions; therefore, it straightforwardly follows that one’s attitude to common situations is really determined by the whole social rules, rather than his or her surroundings. While examples of the validity of this statement abound in everyday life, it can be shown that this claim stops to hold in some extreme cases, some of which are listed below.
Firstly, consider the following fact, true for almost every human agglomerate in the world: the rules of society impose that it is wrong to kill people. It is pretty easy to maintain an attitude congruent to the one stated above in everyday life. But what if someone kills your 8-years son in front of your eyes? It can be possible, in this case, that your attitude against killing someone rapidly changes because it is no more influenced by society, but by this critical situation.
Another extreme example that undermines the statement above regards the concept of euthanasia. Of course, every country has its own laws regarding euthanasia, but at least in my catholic state, people are strongly against this concept. If the above statement were absolutely true, this would mean that no matter the situation, one living in my country would always be against euthanasia. Nonetheless, it again depends on the particular situation. For example, if one’s mother is in coma since two years and the doctors state that there is no hope that she is going to wake up, one’s opinion about euthanasia could change because of personal feelings.
On the other hand, discarding all of the previous extreme examples, the concept of society that shapes the way one thinks is applicable to the most common situations in life. In fact, think about your roughest day when you had a thousand matters to deal with and still you had to wait patiently in line at the supermarket. If society’s rules didn’t matter at all in one’s attitudes, then you would surpass everyone without thinking twice about that. But that is not the case since it is in these common situations that society really acts to influence people’s attitudes and thus contribute to an organized world (and line in the supermarket).
In conclusion, society surely shape the attitudes of people and it should always be like that; on the contrary, we would live in a disorganized world where the people’s rights would not be the same for everyone but the most powerful would decide what is best for them. Nonetheless, it is also true that society does not completely influence our behaviours, that also depend on the particular situation, as I demonstrated through two examples.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 31, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ings. On the other hand, discarding all of the previous extreme examples, the concept ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 633, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd thus contribute to an organized world and line in the supermarket . In conc...
^^
Line 7, column 662, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...nized world and line in the supermarket . In conclusion, society surely shape ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, nonetheless, really, regarding, so, still, then, therefore, thus, while, at least, for example, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, of course, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2342.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 474.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94092827004 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64914055995 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518987341772 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 743.4 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4759429565 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.111111111 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3888888889 5.21951772744 218% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205668966389 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590532416498 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390363827691 0.0758088955206 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110723055369 0.150359130593 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440676492892 0.0667264976115 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.