Agree. Stick to old methods will not lead to improvements and will eventually deteriorate. For example, an advanced and powerful country may feel more comfortable clinging to their obsolete ways since the country is already financially stable. But, other countries are improving, and the advanced technology leads to changes in the economy dynamically. Therefore, sticking the old ways is not beneficial.
Progression for improvements can be seen among researchers. In order to excel and breakthrough, researchers try many times and learn from failures. If they cling on to obsolete ways and they fear of what is going to happen, there will not be any new inventions or theories.
If a country is currently having financial crisis. The ruler should think of other ways to solve the problem and not clinging on to the initial way of handling financial issues. Besides, if Tsunami or Earthquake strikes a country more terrible than before, the people in that country should think of ways to overcome the problem not clinging on to obsolete ways.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 274, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... not be any new inventions or theories. If a country is currently having financial...
^^^^
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oblem not clinging on to obsolete ways.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, may, so, therefore, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.3162921348 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 33.0505617978 12% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 58.6224719101 43% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 12.9106741573 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 2235.4752809 39% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 170.0 442.535393258 38% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16470588235 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 4.55969084622 79% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89741562449 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 215.323595506 47% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.4932671777 122% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 704.065955056 38% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.547032799 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.8 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 5.21951772744 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209474813365 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736370543177 0.0831039109588 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706556696679 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138055670016 0.150359130593 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472082679234 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 100.480337079 43% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.