Seniority (years of service) should not be the basis of employee compensation. Employees should be promoted and given raises solely on the basis of their work performance and merit. That is a better way to encourage high productivity.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations or reading.
The alacrity to work depends on the area of interest, work culture and employee compensation.
The productivity at a work place can be kept high if the employees work hard. So, this hard work
should be rewarded as well. The employees should be promoted and compensated from time to
time depending on their work performance and merit which will help these employee continue
their hard work and in turn will yield high productivity.
Let us take the example of one of the largest companies in the world, Google. Google provides its
employees with all the amenities and perks they may need in an office environment. The Google
office is regarded as the best place to work. But it is the best not only because of its flamboyant
office or free food, but because the employees are compensated well enough to increase
productivity. The great minds are promoted to senior positions if they prove themselves and thus
there are many young employees who head a department with people, some of whom are double
their age.
Thus, seniority should be on the basis of the the employee's talent and performance and not on the
basis of years of experience with high compensation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... employees work hard. So, this hard work should be rewarded as well. The employee...
^^^
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...be promoted and compensated from time to time depending on their work performance...
^^^
Line 4, column 68, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this employee' or 'these employees'?
Suggestion: this employee; these employees
...k performance and merit which will help these employee continue their hard work and in turn ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... which will help these employee continue their hard work and in turn will yield h...
^^^
Line 7, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n the world, Google. Google provides its employees with all the amenities and per...
^^^
Line 8, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eed in an office environment. The Google office is regarded as the best place to ...
^^^
Line 9, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... best not only because of its flamboyant office or free food, but because the emp...
^^^
Line 10, column 87, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... are compensated well enough to increase productivity. The great minds are promot...
^^^
Line 11, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...itions if they prove themselves and thus there are many young employees who head ...
^^^
Line 12, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent with people, some of whom are double their age. Thus, seniority should be ...
^^^
Line 15, column 43, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...us, seniority should be on the basis of the the employee's talent and performance ...
^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 43, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...us, seniority should be on the basis of the the employee's talent and performance ...
^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...;s talent and performance and not on the basis of years of experience with high c...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'thus', 'well']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.254545454545 0.238963963785 107% => OK
Verbs: 0.140909090909 0.154291517835 91% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0681818181818 0.0886310499679 77% => OK
Adverbs: 0.05 0.0506014161523 99% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0454545454545 0.0449626384858 101% => OK
Prepositions: 0.113636363636 0.123526278965 92% => OK
Participles: 0.0363636363636 0.0379742944744 96% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.79420829574 2.82910677849 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0227272727273 0.0316879551592 72% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0014075125626 0% => More particles wanted.
Determiners: 0.109090909091 0.0950106342287 115% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0318181818182 0.0245489744465 130% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0136363636364 0.0157978311181 86% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1192.0 2899.98275862 41% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 200.0 478.390804598 42% => More words wanted.
Chars per words: 5.96 6.0591788892 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 4.65681771538 81% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.285 0.369966551584 77% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.22 0.285172536893 77% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.18 0.207245337619 87% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.13 0.136322040163 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79420829574 2.82910677849 99% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 234.298850575 48% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.492565540709 114% => OK
Word variations: 51.0187531067 56.8184620615 90% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 21.1264367816 47% => More sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.7468607788 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7160853863 62.0618507366 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.2 143.81877709 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 23.7468607788 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.6 0.728815259664 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 14.0 4.87931034483 287% => There are something wrong with the essay format.
Language errors: 13.0 7.71264367816 169% => OK
Readability: 42.0 52.2641144681 80% => OK
Elegance: 1.71153846154 1.64547068916 104% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.596200817082 0.39480681544 151% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.16275024474 0.11556216369 141% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.055738106051 0.0736162880345 76% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.798662553074 0.531340600358 150% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.251587813985 0.15197228837 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.264428972406 0.158818324754 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148759631315 0.0851127212816 175% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.12075149108 0.388921930462 31% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0876071791803 0.0677916285025 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221251425789 0.28015025965 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13051018261 0.0610219844235 214% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.8591954023 64% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.30459770115 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.96264367816 40% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 8.10632183908 62% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.93390804598 25% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.04597701149 66% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 15.0862068966 53% => OK
--------------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 41.67 out of 100
Scores by essay E-rater: 2.5 Out of 6