Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
When it comes to the issue the best way for flourishing children’s talents, some people suggest that society should identify children’s abilities and provide training for them at early age. However, the others have opposite view and think that this suggestion can affect peoples negatively. As far as I am concerned, the last point carries more weight. I take this position on account for the following reason.
The first and important reason is that we can not realize all of children’s talent in the early age. Hence, it is entirely possible we training them in a certain field, while we find out the have many talents in other areas.
A further point we must consider is that developing children’s abilities in a certain field can prohibit children to have all-around development. For example, when a child spends more time for practice playing piano, he have not enough time for communicating and playing with his peers. This cause he can not developed his social skill, which plays a crucial role in the life. In addition, training in the early age can have plenty of negative impacts on their mined. In these years, children can not thinking critically and everything the teacher say them, they accept without doubt in its correctness. As a result, we give the independence thinking of them, which is horrible.
In contrast, children in the early age can learn easy and better, while training them when they are young is difficult. In fact, a child has a flexible mind which helps him to gain information of environment as much as possible. This feature lets educator to teach huge of knowledge for children. Moreover, there are many children in the world that can not foster their talent because of factors like poverty. Therefore, society can discover their talent an assist them to flourish their talents. I think that Lionel Messi is the best example in this matter. As we all know, when he was suffers of growth hormone deficient and his family could pay his treatment, Barcelona football club undertakes all expenses, because they find that he had brilliant and unique talent in football.
All above evidence supports this fact that focus on the special talents at early age can damage other children’s talents, and have numerous effects on their spirit. Of course, as an English proverb goes “a coin has two sides”; therefore, those who agree with this suggestion partially reasonable that in the early age children can better improve their abilities. Nonetheless, I strongly believe that dangerous of this suggestion outweigh its profits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 226, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...ore time for practice playing piano, he have not enough time for communicating and p...
^^^^
Line 5, column 315, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'develop'
Suggestion: develop
...g with his peers. This cause he can not developed his social skill, which plays a crucial...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 507, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'can' requires base form of the verb: 'think'
Suggestion: think
...mined. In these years, children can not thinking critically and everything the teacher s...
^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... this suggestion outweigh its profits.
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'nonetheless', 'so', 'therefore', 'while', 'for example', 'i think', 'in addition', 'in contrast', 'in fact', 'of course', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.244 0.240241500013 102% => OK
Verbs: 0.13 0.157235817809 83% => OK
Adjectives: 0.1 0.0880659088768 114% => OK
Adverbs: 0.036 0.0497285424764 72% => OK
Pronouns: 0.076 0.0444667217837 171% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.12 0.12292977631 98% => OK
Participles: 0.014 0.0406280797675 34% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.78162972142 2.79330140395 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.01 0.030933414821 32% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.002 0.0016655270985 120% => OK
Determiners: 0.086 0.0997080785238 86% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.028 0.0249443105267 112% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.02 0.0148568991511 135% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2603.0 2732.02544248 95% => OK
No of words: 426.0 452.878318584 94% => OK
Chars per words: 6.1103286385 6.0361032391 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.58838876751 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.366197183099 0.366273622748 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.295774647887 0.280924506359 105% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.201877934272 0.200843997647 101% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.115023474178 0.132149295362 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78162972142 2.79330140395 100% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 219.290929204 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537558685446 0.48968727796 110% => OK
Word variations: 62.0326187559 55.4138127331 112% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6194690265 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.3636363636 23.380412469 83% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0023078385 59.4972553346 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.318181818 141.124799967 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3636363636 23.380412469 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.727272727273 0.674092028746 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 48.9411011524 51.4728631049 95% => OK
Elegance: 1.56198347107 1.64882698954 95% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361440442574 0.391690518653 92% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0889333435358 0.123202303941 72% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0609773941728 0.077325440228 79% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.468615000517 0.547984918172 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.138863592764 0.149214159877 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124791331493 0.161403998019 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731956514909 0.0892212321368 82% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.359491453411 0.385218514788 93% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0850271896482 0.0692045440612 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241869281207 0.275328986314 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316585186964 0.0653680567796 48% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.4325221239 153% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 7.22455752212 138% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.66592920354 27% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.5995575221 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.