Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns

Essay topics:

Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed.

Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.

This topic raises a controversial issue of whether, the political leaders should provide people with all the information or not. Indisputably, there are many covert operations going on by the politic leaders to which information is not shared. Nevertheless, there must be transparency in the system which is democratic and the flow of information should not withhold. Thus, I generally disagree with the contention that the politician should uphold information necessarily and desirably, and would argue that there should be a transparent form government.
Firstly, according to the new amendment made in the constitution, the right to information is now considered among the basic rights of this democratic society. So, it now the right of a person to know the information. To illustrate it, let us take an example of the country where in there is no information rights to the people, in such a country, people might never know what their government is pursuing for them? Such a society is sure to doom.
Secondly, if the political leaders does not share the information with the society, than he might be a culprit of larceny from the people of the nation to whom he serves. Also, it is possible that due to lack of the proper information being provided to the people there be a loss of time, money, and talent that the society possess. For example, under the Pradhan Mantri Gramin Vikas Yojana, many schemes are provided to the farmers for their comfort ease of the purpose, but, if they don't know about it or the information is kept furtive than there is no purpose of implementing it on the first place.
Admittedly, there are many such undertakings for which the information must not be provide to the people as they might consists the matter of national security. To illustrate, take an example of the nuclear test that was conducted by former Indian President at Bhokhran. Such matters are better kept withhold from the people of the society. Further more, there might be some other information relating to the defense services that are kept secretive from the society, but these can be considered the matters that are not affecting the normal life of people directly.
In sum the suggestion of the author that the information should be kept secret from the society is indefensible. This suggestion runs contrary to the overwhelming evidence that transparent and clear information helps in progress of the society. Thus, as long as certain measurements are provided, or some cases are involved the conclusion that the information should be provided to the people holds credit.

Votes
Average: 5.5 (4 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 486, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...mfort ease of the purpose, but, if they dont know about it or the information is kep...
^^^^
Line 5, column 408, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...be provided to the people holds credit.
^^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'nevertheless', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'thus', 'for example']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.215189873418 0.240241500013 90% => OK
Verbs: 0.151898734177 0.157235817809 97% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0759493670886 0.0880659088768 86% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0590717299578 0.0497285424764 119% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0295358649789 0.0444667217837 66% => OK
Prepositions: 0.118143459916 0.12292977631 96% => OK
Participles: 0.0443037974684 0.0406280797675 109% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.8704580602 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0337552742616 0.030933414821 109% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.135021097046 0.0997080785238 135% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0295358649789 0.0249443105267 118% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0189873417722 0.0148568991511 128% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2592.0 2732.02544248 95% => OK
No of words: 430.0 452.878318584 95% => OK
Chars per words: 6.02790697674 6.0361032391 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.58838876751 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.351162790698 0.366273622748 96% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.26976744186 0.280924506359 96% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.197674418605 0.200843997647 98% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.137209302326 0.132149295362 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8704580602 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 219.290929204 93% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474418604651 0.48968727796 97% => OK
Word variations: 52.2842921561 55.4138127331 94% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6194690265 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.8888888889 23.380412469 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1158666416 59.4972553346 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.0 141.124799967 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 23.380412469 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.611111111111 0.674092028746 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 50.8656330749 51.4728631049 99% => OK
Elegance: 1.5701754386 1.64882698954 95% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358171535735 0.391690518653 91% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.173741795986 0.123202303941 141% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0951185574032 0.077325440228 123% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.663309172735 0.547984918172 121% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.124746906135 0.149214159877 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.186908876828 0.161403998019 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474793815558 0.0892212321368 53% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.532431752452 0.385218514788 138% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0956119083345 0.0692045440612 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273272104157 0.275328986314 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.015566405456 0.0653680567796 24% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.4325221239 48% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.30420353982 151% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 7.22455752212 55% => OK
Negative topic words: 8.0 3.66592920354 218% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.70907079646 148% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.