Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Efficiency is a vital factor to evaluate the capability of political leadership. What are the criteria for the evaluation of whether a leader is effective or not? While some people assert that political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of comprise, others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives. Both of the above claims may appear plausible at first glance, however, I would like to say that an effective leader should act from both sides since each of them are not mutually exclusive.
To begin with, what does efficiency define when it refers to look into a political leader's behavior? As the highest management in the political area, the effective leader is competent to bring peace and stability to the society that he or she serves, to make the people wealth and safe, and to boom the economy and culture in his or her area by a limited resource utilization within a
short period. When a leader plan to implement his or her actions, there should be different opinions coming from either public or internal organizations. For example, when Theodore Roosevelt announced the "A Big Deal" which stimulated the economy of the United State from World War II, the abound adversaries and oppositions from the different classes sprouted out. If Roosevelt yielded to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise, the economy of America will to the most extent still in the depression. It demonstrated the idea of the most essential quality of an effective leader needs to have the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives.
On the contrary, if an effective political leader insists opinions of his or her own every time and never adopts the suggestions and pieces of advice from the public, he or she is an arbitrary and dogmatic leader who is harmful and hazardous to society and the organization he or she serves. A wise political leader knows the strategy of dealing with the opposite opinions and is willing to yield to public voice when it is necessary to abandon principle for the sake of compromise.
That being said, to find the balance of these two appeared opposite claims is a method to lead success for an effective leader. Sometimes, the public is blind to important issues due to insufficient information, therefore the political leader should persist his commitment to dedicated policy and target without any compromise. Let us have a look at the following representative example. When the nation encounters the danger from terrorism, the effective leader has to make a decision to defend his nation and his people without hearing from the public opinion. In other cases, before the new road expansion plan implements, a certain survey is a much smart choice to hear from public opinion. A decision should be made upon the feedback from the survey by an effective leader with yielding to public opinion if the demerit of the road expansion plan outweighs the merit of it.
In conclusion, the above-examination of the two views disclosed my appreciation for both of them. Nevertheless, this is not to say that I suggest appraising these two perspectives in isolation. Rather, I would like to view the process of decision-making of government officials as a continuum that includes public voices and officials' individual decisions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 84, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...when it refers to look into a political leaders behavior? As the highest management in ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 385, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a limited resource utilization within a short period. When a leader plan to impl...
^^^
Line 5, column 298, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... of the United State from World War II, the abound adversaries and oppositions from the di...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 91.0 58.6224719101 155% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2910.0 2235.4752809 130% => OK
No of words: 569.0 442.535393258 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11423550088 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88402711743 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92127233498 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 215.323595506 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474516695958 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 945.0 704.065955056 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.748936282 60.3974514979 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.571428571 118.986275619 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0952380952 23.4991977007 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61904761905 5.21951772744 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.49350578009 0.243740707755 202% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145652300921 0.0831039109588 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.157919484529 0.0758088955206 208% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252672573559 0.150359130593 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.158063518881 0.0667264976115 237% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 48.8420337079 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 100.480337079 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.