Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society.
The apparent paradox, between thinking of people is quite evident. Some people believe that morality must be taught while some argue that logical reasoning would be more efficient in upbringing of a moral society. Indeed, morality and logical reasoning are connected to human and society values.
Logical reasoning is a precursor to moral society. If people are taught to be logical, then moral values gets naturally incorporated. Whereas, the opposite is improbable. Galileo, was jailed because of his logical reasoning based on his findings that, earth is not at the center of the universe and it revolves around the sun. Also, sun is much larger then earth. Galileo, was jailed for his experiment and his work was confiscated, because moral values at that time did not allow anyone to question the integrity of earth and the erroneous doubt people had that earth was all superior. Galileo discovery led to various positive effect on the field of science and man could thus land on mars. If Galileo was taught to be moral, he won't be able to determine what he had and it would be highly likely we would be in the same dilemma, about earth being all-powerful. Galileo's, experiment and study brought about a change in people thinking, and moral values.
On the contrary, People sometimes don't use their intellect, and base their decisions highly on the basis of logical thinking rather than being moral. Rich people, generally don't donate their money because their logic says that it could be daunting to their money vault. Bill and Melinda Gates foundation, donate huge amount of money to Indian NGOs' Had they been logical, about the fact that donation of money would mean less money in their vault, they would not donate. Additionally, millions of people who are benefited out of these donations would remain in dismay.
To sum it up, although it is quite possible that a morality as a fundamental is a need of the hour. However, Logical reasoning can bring about the moral values for the society. If I were to choose between living in a moral or a logical society, I would choose the latter.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ral values gets naturally incorporated. Whereas, the opposite is improbable. Galileo, w...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 346, Rule ID: COMPARISONS_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'larger than'?
Suggestion: larger than
...olves around the sun. Also, sun is much larger then earth. Galileo, was jailed for his expe...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 353, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...round the sun. Also, sun is much larger then earth. Galileo, was jailed for his expe...
^^^^
Line 5, column 35, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...s. On the contrary, People sometimes dont use their intellect, and base their dec...
^^^^
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...han being moral. Rich people, generally dont donate their money because their logic ...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'then', 'thus', 'whereas', 'while', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.228070175439 0.240241500013 95% => OK
Verbs: 0.167919799499 0.157235817809 107% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0977443609023 0.0880659088768 111% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0526315789474 0.0497285424764 106% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0551378446115 0.0444667217837 124% => OK
Prepositions: 0.127819548872 0.12292977631 104% => OK
Participles: 0.0401002506266 0.0406280797675 99% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.49312623592 2.79330140395 89% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0275689223058 0.030933414821 89% => OK
Particles: 0.00250626566416 0.0016655270985 150% => OK
Determiners: 0.0726817042607 0.0997080785238 73% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0275689223058 0.0249443105267 111% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00501253132832 0.0148568991511 34% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2101.0 2732.02544248 77% => OK
No of words: 357.0 452.878318584 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.88515406162 6.0361032391 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.58838876751 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.358543417367 0.366273622748 98% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.252100840336 0.280924506359 90% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.176470588235 0.200843997647 88% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0924369747899 0.132149295362 70% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49312623592 2.79330140395 89% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 219.290929204 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509803921569 0.48968727796 104% => OK
Word variations: 54.1641668665 55.4138127331 98% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6194690265 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.7894736842 23.380412469 80% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8733150367 59.4972553346 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.578947368 141.124799967 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7894736842 23.380412469 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.526315789474 0.674092028746 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.21349557522 96% => OK
Readability: 43.9995577178 51.4728631049 85% => OK
Elegance: 1.43636363636 1.64882698954 87% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389680148872 0.391690518653 99% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.132213997827 0.123202303941 107% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0903323523251 0.077325440228 117% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.467187064964 0.547984918172 85% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.15230379904 0.149214159877 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139392652858 0.161403998019 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0918877551844 0.0892212321368 103% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.282450408291 0.385218514788 73% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0714918294917 0.0692045440612 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287314491913 0.275328986314 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0884063454827 0.0653680567796 135% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.4325221239 77% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.30420353982 113% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 7.22455752212 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.66592920354 136% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.5995575221 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.