Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Teachers’ profession play an important role in shaping a student’s future. It would not be wrong to say that student’s complete life depends, to an extent, on teacher and his teachings. Thus it is very important for academic institution to take all necessary measures to keep teachers productive, creative and motivated. Moreover, teaching is a profession like that of engineer, doctor, janitor, sales person etc. Every profession we can think of, employs some kind of incentivization on basis of professional’s work. Teaching is no different. Academic institutions analyzes number of data points, regarding teachers, collected during the academic year at the time of their appraisal.
The issue presented that ‘Teachers’ salaries should be based on their students’ academic performance’ vouches to consider additional metric i.e. students’ performance in deciding teachers’ salaries. Though it seems fair recommendation but after rumination my views incline towards disagreeing the claim.
In an average class size and class length, let’s take 30 students and 1 hr as standard, it’s very very difficult for a teacher to check on progress of each and every student. It’s even more time consuming to do that on regular basis if it takes at least 10 mins to check on one student’s learning. Spending 5 hours on just checking what student has imbibed and that too for just one teacher and one subject turn out to be ridiculous setting.
Also, the idea of not be able to teach a topic properly, even if the teacher is doing best, would constantly bug them and lead to stress and depression of some level. This would directly affect their productivity and can lead disastrous results than it was expected to be.
Moreover, many students don’t pay attention in class willfully. Some students don’t change their behavior even after severe reprimanding. On other hand, some students even if they try hard, can’t build up interest or understanding of the subject. It’s very hard for students to perform well if the subject does not intrigue them. In all cases, it would be very unfair for teachers if their earnings are in hands of such students.
Although, given claim will compel teachers to take their job with much more seriousness and efforts, by completing course rather than giving it off to self study, the price they would pay for this setting cannot be fully compensated in monetary form. After addressing all of the above reasons and examples, it’s best for academic institutions to not consider this as a metric to appraise teachers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 202, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...n extent, on teacher and his teachings. Thus it is very important for academic insti...
^^^^
Line 5, column 104, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: very
...tudents and 1 hr as standard, it's very very difficult for a teacher to check on pro...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 269, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ated in monetary form. After addressing all of the above reasons and examples, it's b...
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'moreover', 'regarding', 'so', 'thus', 'well', 'at least', 'kind of', 'in all cases']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.227871939736 0.240241500013 95% => OK
Verbs: 0.154425612053 0.157235817809 98% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0828625235405 0.0880659088768 94% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0527306967985 0.0497285424764 106% => OK
Pronouns: 0.045197740113 0.0444667217837 102% => OK
Prepositions: 0.111111111111 0.12292977631 90% => OK
Participles: 0.0395480225989 0.0406280797675 97% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.20896715207 2.79330140395 115% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0320150659134 0.030933414821 103% => OK
Particles: 0.00376647834275 0.0016655270985 226% => OK
Determiners: 0.0640301318267 0.0997080785238 64% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0207156308851 0.0249443105267 83% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00188323917137 0.0148568991511 13% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2642.0 2732.02544248 97% => OK
No of words: 416.0 452.878318584 92% => OK
Chars per words: 6.35096153846 6.0361032391 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.58838876751 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.367788461538 0.366273622748 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.317307692308 0.280924506359 113% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.259615384615 0.200843997647 129% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.163461538462 0.132149295362 124% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20896715207 2.79330140395 115% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 219.290929204 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591346153846 0.48968727796 121% => OK
Word variations: 72.2013273182 55.4138127331 130% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6194690265 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.9090909091 23.380412469 81% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8427340741 59.4972553346 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.090909091 141.124799967 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9090909091 23.380412469 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.674092028746 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 50.6398601399 51.4728631049 98% => OK
Elegance: 1.5 1.64882698954 91% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385256497185 0.391690518653 98% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.129956414753 0.123202303941 105% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.102999316709 0.077325440228 133% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.524183222257 0.547984918172 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.161782003416 0.149214159877 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138342338758 0.161403998019 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0841679397529 0.0892212321368 94% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.214533366127 0.385218514788 56% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0227186471972 0.0692045440612 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247704932265 0.275328986314 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.072707398743 0.0653680567796 111% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.4325221239 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.30420353982 170% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 7.22455752212 97% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 3.66592920354 191% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.