To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The statement overshadows the importance of major cities while attempting to understand the characteristics of a society. While mentioning about the attributes of a society confined not to the narrow scope but, encompasses a wide variety of topics such as the clothing trends, diversity of food and worshiping culture followed by each group of people. Also, major cities, on the other hand, are characterized as the best reflection of the recent trends in the country.
The statement attempts to bridge the study of major cities to understand the society. But deeply flawed by the assumption that prominent areas/cities exactly mirrors the tradition and customs of the area. While it is true that major cities are in commensurate with the latest updates, it might also be valid for those cities to accustom to the changing fashion thereby, losing its traditional values.
Furthermore, immigration though, cannot be confined to the major cities alone is one of the biggest backdrop and source for changes in society greatly calls into question the given statement. In the case where people from different places accumulate together, the interchange of concepts with their neighborhoods eventually increases the possibility of losing their very culture. In addition, due to the increase in technological advancements, people tend to be in sync with the latest updates. For instance, with the advent of inline shopping across the globe, the clothing fashion suffered a great swing.
On the other hand, rural areas comprised of indigenous people of the society are dogmatic to any changes to their nomadic culture sound to be more appropriate in holding the tradition. For example, Mongolia popularly known for withstanding its conventional custom holds a big leap in comprehending the nature of a society.
The recent advancements and easy transportation revolutionized in great proportion than anytime in the history. Therefore, the statement linking the major cities to characteristics of a society is inappropriate as many factors as discussed could possibly undermine the idea to great extent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 207, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing the tradition. For example, Mongolia popularly known for withstanding its con...
^^
Line 9, column 241, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...ppropriate as many factors as discussed could possibly undermine the idea to great extent.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 33.0505617978 30% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1780.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 327.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44342507645 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11065550175 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559633027523 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.214950442 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.142857143 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3571428571 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 5.21951772744 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154710165523 0.243740707755 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606115212372 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610383867084 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0836913825478 0.150359130593 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018385862841 0.0667264976115 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.38706741573 117% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.