Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
A sudden surge in the number of courses available for students has been witnessed in the any field of study, opening the gateway for students to choose their study of interest. The statement while attempting to seek additional values for a student by permitting them to take up outside classes overarchs the difficulties faced by students in achieving the point.
The statement suggesting the universities to urge students in taking up the classes outside their study field completely ignores the underlying issues and its consequences. Though for a student to learn other subjects, not connected with their current field seem to be an added advantage, the students find it difficult to cope up with the rate at which the current technological advancements are blooming for any given particular field, leading to failure of a student's success in both the courses. Spending time to take up courses that are irrelevant to their course of study would result in waste in time.
Additionally, students are enrolled in universities based on their field of interest. But requiring them to enroll in subjects they are not interested will result in loss of their enthusiasm and interests. For example, demanding a student interested in Mathematics to enroll in the subject of Philosophy is completely ridiculous and in fact, students should have spend more time in understanding their uninterested subjects. Moreover, taking up additional course require students to pay extra tuition costs which leads to perfect imbalance of students economical budget.
However, given in history of any field, there exists an inter relation between two fields of study. Surely, indulging students in courses that are relevant to their field of study has the positive impact. For example, a student enrolled in the course of Data Analytics- combination of probability, statistics and programming, one might be in need of enrolling in mathematics classes. In such cases, the statement holds true point as it somehow supports the student's success in their field of study. Furthermore, universities cannot provide these courses as a part of their enrolled field due to its well-established curriculum and syllabus.
Finally, universities should no impose any additional rules on students' interest in forcing them to take up additional classes. Also, the duty of universities is making all relevant courses available within student's reach.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 191, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e their study of interest. The statement while attempting to seek additional valu...
^^
Line 3, column 463, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...rticular field, leading to failure of a students success in both the courses. Spending t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 364, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...ulous and in fact, students should have spend more time in understanding their uninte...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 54, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...n in history of any field, there exists an inter relation between two fields of study. S...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 458, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...s true point as it somehow supports the students success in their field of study. Furthe...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for example, in fact, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2044.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 379.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39313984169 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00322042486 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501319261214 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.9332249245 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.75 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6875 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.21951772744 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279696981716 0.243740707755 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111078917036 0.0831039109588 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425636650874 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179333814752 0.150359130593 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0202128621513 0.0667264976115 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.