The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
ANSWER
The graph illustrates the amount of four different kinds of meat which the European consumed from 1979 to 2004 period.
Overall, it is clear that fish was the least commonly used of food while chicken considered the most consumed meat throughout the period. Despite the fluctuate increase in chicken, the figure for lamb and beef decreased at the end of time.
In 1979, the amount of beef using was the highest among the four types of meat, at about 220 grams per person per week. The figure for lamb was lower at 150 grams consumption. Although the consumption of beef reached a peak in 1982 of about 240 grams, it felt moderately to 100 grams in 2004. The consumption of lambs was lower at under 150 grams after the period it declines to 50 grams.
The figure for the chicken showed a similar trend to lambs despite some minor decline, it reached the highest consumption at 250 grams in European countries. By contrast, the fish was eaten remained the same which was the lowest among fish and meats.
178 words
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 120, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pean consumed from 1979 to 2004 period. Overall, it is clear that fish was the l...
^^^
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...med meat throughout the period. Despite the fluctuate increase in chicken, the figure for lam...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 232, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nsumption of beef reached a peak in 1982 of about 240 grams, it felt moderately t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 847.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67955801105 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34217655868 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546961325967 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4148487564 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1111111111 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.44444444444 5.23603664747 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142395291284 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581365035166 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0654256201379 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113530586526 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0790052023687 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.