The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.Write at least 150 words.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas.

Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.

Write at least 150 words.

The line graph indicates the figures of exporting wheat in Canada, Australia and European community for a half decade from 1985 to 1990.

At the first glance, the number of Canada and European community rose compared to starting point. By contrast, there was a gradual down ward trend in Australia. A more detailed look at the graph reveals that exporting wheat went down slightly in Canada and European community from 1985 to 1986. However, during the same period, there was a slight increase in exporting wheat in Australia, from about 15 million of tones in 1985 to around 16 million of tones in 1986. Between 1986 to 1988, the figure of Canada had gone up moderately and had reached to a peak of around 25 millions in 1988 before it dropped to the bottom in 1989, just under 15 million of tones. After 1986, Wheat exports of Australia declined steadily until 1989 with just over 10 million of tones. Meanwhile, exporting wheat of European community almost had flattened out between 1986 and 1988 before it started increasing to around 19 million of tones in 1989 and 21 million of tones in 1990 for the first position. The second place belonged to Canada with just under 19 million of tones in 1990 and Australia possessed the third place, with about 11 million of tones.

It is concluded that Wheat exports of both European community and Canada increased compared to starting points and the number of Wheat exports declined moderately in Australia.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)

Comments

compared to starting point.
compared to the starting point.

flaws:
No. of Words: 250 200
Write the essay in 20 minutes. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. Don't put everything in details.

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 10
No. of Words: 250 200
No. of Characters: 1181 1000
No. of Different Words: 110 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.976 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.724 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.373 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 86 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 63 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 43 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 24 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.402 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.483 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.608 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.177 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4