The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
The provided line graph illustrates information on merchandise transferred in Britain through four various methods of transport such as road, rail, water, and pipeline over 28 years, that is from 1978 to 2002. The units are measured in million tonnes.
A glimpse over the diagram portray some intriguing patterns. Overall, it is clearly seen that, albeit there were few flaws observed in each manners of transportation, there was a significant rise noted at the end of year 2002. Over the same given period, mode of road transportation carried greater volume of possessions whereas the pipeline technique taken the lesser amount of stocks.
In terms of road transportation, in 1974 the highest amount which was about 70 million tonnes of freight were carried. After a few ups and downs between 75 and 65 millions in 1978 and 1982 respectively, it started to plummet gradually, then reached to 82 million tonnes over 10 years of period after which there were some remarkable fluctuations in between, however it ended at approximately 98 millions in year 2002.
On the other hand, even though the transportation technique of pipeline showed an incessant rise in the given period, it was the method which carried minimal amount of goods compared to other modes. In case of rail and water, in 1974, both modes carried about 40 million tonnes of stocks, while the quantity of goods carried by water rose substantially to about 55 millions in 1982 where, the rail way declined to around 30 millions in year 1984. After which the water way of transportation remained remarkably at the similar level and reached about 66 millions in 2002 after a slightest fall in 1998. With regards of rail transportation, it had slight dip and rise in between the given period and finally reached just above 40 million tonnes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rious methods of transport such as road, rail, water, and pipeline over 28 years,...
^^
Line 1, column 238, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...1978 to 2002. The units are measured in million tonnes. A glimpse over the diagra...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... units are measured in million tonnes. A glimpse over the diagram portray some ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...terns. Overall, it is clearly seen that, albeit there were few flaws observed in ...
^^
Line 2, column 381, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...peline technique taken the lesser amount of stocks. In terms of road transporta...
^^
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... millions in 1978 and 1982 respectively, it started to plummet gradually, then re...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pproximately 98 millions in year 2002. On the other hand, even though the tra...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 24, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s in year 2002. On the other hand, even though the transportation techniqu...
^^
Line 4, column 37, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...2. On the other hand, even though the transportation technique of pipeline...
^^
Line 4, column 241, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...des. In case of rail and water, in 1974, both modes carried about 40 million tonn...
^^
Line 4, column 584, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...reached about 66 millions in 2002 after a slightest fall in 1998. With regards of...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, so, then, whereas, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 33.7804878049 189% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 965.302439024 156% => OK
No of words: 301.0 196.424390244 153% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00332225914 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81129481732 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 106.607317073 155% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548172757475 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 283.868780488 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.2360684615 43.030603864 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.909090909 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3636363636 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72727272727 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 1.69756097561 648% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180022321879 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0629322460623 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047040305771 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109251942681 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037811005269 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 40.7170731707 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.