1. The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugar and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the man features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates information about changes in the price of three groups different food product from 1978 to 2009. Generally speaking, the line graph witnessed an upward trend over the period of time. However, the price change of fresh fruits and vegetables noticed a quick growth in the period between 1978 and 2009.
In particular, all the line graph had same starting figure in 1979, at 60. Over the period, the consumer price index rose steadily from 60 at 1979 to about 200 in 2009. The carbonated drinks had the least increase over the time, at over 150 at 2009. This was followed by the price of sugar and sweets, it gradually increased between 1979 and 2009, at 60 and 200 respectively. The number of fresh fruits and vegetables showed a quickly rise during the period of 40 years. It had to start at 60 in 1979, after 40 years, the number of the price of fresh fruits and vegetables had a top in the line graph, at 330 in 2009.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...raph witnessed an upward trend over the period of time. However, the price change of fresh fru...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 425, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('quickly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('rise') instead of another adjective.
...r of fresh fruits and vegetables showed a quickly rise during the period of 40 years. It had t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 777.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.51744186047 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3612597471 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 216.0 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.0169020022 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.3333333333 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21504189821 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104725811007 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641319110239 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187699336195 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399420207751 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.87 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.