20. The diagrams below show the main reasons workers chose to work from home and the hours males and females worked at home for the year 2019.
The bar chart and table displayed give information about why men and women worked from the house and their working hours at home in 2019.
According to the bar chart, saving money, being more productive and getting easier childcare were the three main reasons for employees to work from home this year. It is noticeable that the most significant advantage of working at their house was saving money for both male workers (45%) and female workers (42%). While 24% of men preferred to work from home due to higher productivity, 26% of women chose to work at home for taking care of children conveniently.
Looking at the table graph, we can see the majority of females (74%) who had worked at home worked under ten hours per week and 6% of them worked over 30 hours in 2019. The story was totally different for males, with 81% of male workers had more than 30 hours worktime at home and only 3% of guys worked less than 10 hours.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 762.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.53571428571 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24921251021 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607142857143 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 10.0277393043 43.030603864 23% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 127.0 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.544222599434 0.215688989381 252% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.273542548202 0.103423049105 264% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421615812193 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.367921535406 0.15604864568 236% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645749230394 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.