Age discrimination occurs when a decision is made on the basis of a person’s age. In the workplace, these are most often decisions about being employed in the first place, winning promotions or being unfairly dismissed. Should discrimination against older workers be made illegal?
An Organization is because of its employees. Each employee contributes to the success of organization in their own way, irrespective of their age. Age shouldn’t be a factor to determine one’s success and efficiency. Age discrimination at work place should be termed as illegal irrespective it is against younger or older worker.
Every employee has something to offer, younger people have energy, innovative thinking, etc. while older people brings in year of expertise and diverse knowledge. Decision for employment and promotion shouldn’t be based on age but on employee’s hard work and efficiency. When things are going south in an organization, it’s the older employees with their vast experience of handling things in nerve wrecking situation along with younger employee’s innovative thinking and ready to do attitude that comes to the rescue.
In my organization, a project was getting delayed due to some unforeseen circumstances, then the older employees of the organization pitched in with their extensive knowledge of the product and helped younger employees to achieve the deadline. When comes the need of using cutting-edge technology it is the younger generation who needs to be looked upon.
Every organization should effectively utilize their employees based on their area of expertise rather than age. Age shouldn’t be a factor in making any decision. This boosts confidence in employees which in turn ultimately benefits the organization in the long run. If any organization is practicing age discrimination, legal action should be taken against them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 445, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s in nerve wrecking situation along with younger employee's innovative think...
^^
Line 5, column 245, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nger employees to achieve the deadline. When comes the need of using cutting-edge te...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 3.97073170732 403% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1372.0 965.302439024 142% => OK
No of words: 243.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64609053498 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37312529041 2.65546596893 127% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576131687243 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 283.868780488 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.114634146341 1745% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9579784822 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3571428571 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.14285714286 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223495991573 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0907388198943 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0950621988379 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141562470242 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0694566246202 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 61.2550243902 61% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.19 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 40.7170731707 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.