The average annual expenditure on cell phone, national and international fixed- line services, 2001- 2010
The line graph gives information on the expense of cell phone, national fixed-line and international fixed-line services on average during the period from 2001 to 2010.
It is clear that the consumption expenditure for cell phone and national fixed line services were higher than that of international fixed-line services over the period shown. Overall, cell phone services has a upward trend, while there was a slight decline in the national fixed-line services, and finally, international line services almost steadily reminded at the same point over a period of 9 years starting from 2001 to 2010.
In 2001, the expense of national fixed line services on average reached the highest point at $700, whereas spending on cell phone and international services were around $250 and $200 respectively. After 5 years, the average yearly expenditure on national-fixed line services moderately decreased by $200, in contrast, there was a growth by $ 250 in the figure for cell phone services. However, expense for international line services only ranged from less than $300.
In 2006, Both national fixed line and cell phone services has the same number, at $500. From 2006 to 2010, cell phone services gradually went up and reached at nearly $750, while the figure for national fixed line services has a fall to $400, compared to its in 2006. Finally, average expenditure per year on international fixed-line stayed unchanged over the period from 2006 to 2010.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pense of cell phone, national fixed-line and international fixed-line services on...
^^
Line 2, column 208, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...shown. Overall, cell phone services has a upward trend, while there was a slight ...
^
Line 3, column 289, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fixed line services moderately decreased by 00, in contrast, there was a growth b...
^^
Line 3, column 333, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '$250'.
Suggestion: $250
... 00, in contrast, there was a growth by $ 250 in the figure for cell phone services. ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1210.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17094017094 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83586293846 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.448717948718 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 375.3 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8382110145 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.444444444 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.629864696372 0.215688989381 292% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.360467590626 0.103423049105 349% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117742243003 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.504419102742 0.15604864568 323% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583090653097 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.